1997
DOI: 10.1080/09647779708565838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Looking in Everyday Life/Gazing in Museums

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The other determinants of change detection can be divided between bottom-up, or stimulus-driven, factors, such as visual salience, and top-down, or goal-driven, factors, such as context, gist and motivation ( Borji and Itti, 2013 ). It has been suggested that both bottom-up and top-down factors are enhanced in the visual interactions that take place within museums, due to the exceptional and exemplary nature of the objects being viewed, and the intensity of observation and motivation to form interpretations from what is seen, respectively ( O’Neill and Dufresne-Tassé, 1997 ). However, later discussions have warned against ‘uncritical acceptance of the distinction between utilitarian (ordinary) and the aesthetic (museum) seeing,’ and while it is acknowledged that ‘the notion of the distinction…is, in one form or another, firmly embedded in many account of vision and aesthetic experience,’ in fact, ‘cognitive neuroscience does not supply any facts that could substantiate the sharp divide between the ‘normal’ and the aesthetic perception’ ( Kesner, 2006 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The other determinants of change detection can be divided between bottom-up, or stimulus-driven, factors, such as visual salience, and top-down, or goal-driven, factors, such as context, gist and motivation ( Borji and Itti, 2013 ). It has been suggested that both bottom-up and top-down factors are enhanced in the visual interactions that take place within museums, due to the exceptional and exemplary nature of the objects being viewed, and the intensity of observation and motivation to form interpretations from what is seen, respectively ( O’Neill and Dufresne-Tassé, 1997 ). However, later discussions have warned against ‘uncritical acceptance of the distinction between utilitarian (ordinary) and the aesthetic (museum) seeing,’ and while it is acknowledged that ‘the notion of the distinction…is, in one form or another, firmly embedded in many account of vision and aesthetic experience,’ in fact, ‘cognitive neuroscience does not supply any facts that could substantiate the sharp divide between the ‘normal’ and the aesthetic perception’ ( Kesner, 2006 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current experiment, we sought first to demonstrate whether change blindness could be produced inside a museum, using ancient museum artefacts as visual stimuli. It has been suggested that the visual interactions taking placed within museums involve enhanced perception compared to everyday visual interactions ( O’Neill and Dufresne-Tassé, 1997 ), raising the question of whether change blindness is still a demonstrable phenomenon under such conditions. Inattentional blindness has been previously investigated in a museum setting ( Levy, 2011 ), but as far as we are aware this is the first attempt to produce change blindness inside a museum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ce souci officialise cependant l'échec, déjà constaté dans la pratique quotidienne des musées, de la dynamique malrusienne défendant le principe d'un accès spontané aux chefs-d'oeuvre de l'humanité, la force du message et l'appétence humaine pour l'exceptionnel devant naturellement aboutirà une rencontre 5 . Les travaux de Bourdieu 6 ont, en parallèle, mis en lumière la réalité, scientifiquement constatée, de l'élitisme social de la pratique culturelle, plus précisément, de la venue au musée.…”
unclassified