2017
DOI: 10.4155/fsoa-2017-0040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Looking to the Future of Organs-on-Chip

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these approaches it is important to ensure that the flow rates and shear forces delivered to the cancer cells are benchmarked against in vivo parameters. Concordance studies with different 3D cancer model systems under flow are now an important aim, the realisation of this will enable standardisation and adoption into the pharmaceutical drug development pipeline and is expected will result in reductions in the use of in vivo model systems 49 51 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these approaches it is important to ensure that the flow rates and shear forces delivered to the cancer cells are benchmarked against in vivo parameters. Concordance studies with different 3D cancer model systems under flow are now an important aim, the realisation of this will enable standardisation and adoption into the pharmaceutical drug development pipeline and is expected will result in reductions in the use of in vivo model systems 49 51 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CCLE was found to have a preponderance of mutations in cell-cycle related genes. As well as the potential for selection pressures to be causative of these differences, in this comparison it should also be appreciated that PDX models and TCGA represent naive tumor populations, whereas the CCLE consists of many models from later stage disease that have previously been exposed to therapies, compromising the comparison It should also be noted that a new generation of cell line models are being created directly from patients and PDX models both in 2D and three-dimensional (3D) with multiple layers of complexity by many groups [ 26 , 76 , 77 ]; only time will tell how this new generation of cell lines or model systems such as organ-on-a-chip [ 78 ] represent the patient population as compared to PDXs, and if using PDX models in vivo will be surpassed in high-throughput studies with the relative ease and cost factors of in vitro experiments.…”
Section: Fidelity and Stability Of Pdx Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standardization guidelines currently do not exist, and different platforms exhibit various data collection endpoints, which makes platform-to-platform comparison a challenging task. As MPS platforms move beyond the prototype stage developed primarily to suit a proof of concept, the growing interest for practical applications is giving rise to scaled-up production and commercially available platforms, which are now finding their niche for both academic and industrial research (Greenman, 2017). Overall, MPS platforms comprise a chip encasing a microcirculation pathway that leads to a growth chamber populated with cells.…”
Section: Mps Models and The Enhancement Of In Vitro Phenotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standardization of MPS models would make the applications of these platforms more translatable and concerted efforts of different institutions, such as the National Institutes of Health and regulatory agencies, are considering the feasibility, applications, and prospective uses of MPS platforms in drug development (Marx et al, 2016;Ewart et al, 2017;Greenman, 2017). This could lead to guidelines governing the use of MPS models when this technology is still maturing, and drug transporter studies can positively benefit from such an approach.…”
Section: Limitations Challenges and Opportunities Of Mps Applicatiomentioning
confidence: 99%