1999
DOI: 10.1364/ol.24.001466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loop-mirror filters based on saturable-gain or -absorber gratings

Abstract: We present a novel all-fiber narrow-band filter based on pump-induced saturable-gain or-absorber gratings in a loop mirror. Our design provides built-in interferometric phase alignment of the signal to the grating for optimal filtering. Notch or bandpass functionality is determined by the choice of gain or absorption and the input ports selected for the pump and signal. The loop-mirror filter has potential bandwidths from the submegahertz to beyond the gigahertz regimes, and one can tune it optically by changi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference with the classical case of a bulk holographic medium [13], [15], [16] is that the effective gain grating in a fiber should be taken into account instead of the absorption one. The final equations for the modulation amplitudes of the counter-propagating signal beams in the fiber are as follows: (6) where and are the powers of the counter-propagating waves (see Fig. 2), and are the modulation amplitudes of the signal beams at the fundamental and second harmonics of the PM-signal at the frequency (note that is meant to be much higher than reciprocal relaxation time of the active medium), is the fiber gain coefficient averaged over the grating period, and are the amplitudes of the BGs in absence of PM, are the Bessel functions of the zeroth, first, and second orders, and is the PM amplitude.…”
Section: Pmbc and Two-pass Amplifying In Erbium-doped Fibermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The difference with the classical case of a bulk holographic medium [13], [15], [16] is that the effective gain grating in a fiber should be taken into account instead of the absorption one. The final equations for the modulation amplitudes of the counter-propagating signal beams in the fiber are as follows: (6) where and are the powers of the counter-propagating waves (see Fig. 2), and are the modulation amplitudes of the signal beams at the fundamental and second harmonics of the PM-signal at the frequency (note that is meant to be much higher than reciprocal relaxation time of the active medium), is the fiber gain coefficient averaged over the grating period, and are the amplitudes of the BGs in absence of PM, are the Bessel functions of the zeroth, first, and second orders, and is the PM amplitude.…”
Section: Pmbc and Two-pass Amplifying In Erbium-doped Fibermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparently, because of high gain/absorption in the erbium fiber used ( nm cm and nm cm ) the dependence of powers of both the signal beams on the fiber length needs to be accounted for [see (6)]. On the other hand, one can neglect in these equations an influence of the spontaneous emission in erbium fiber.…”
Section: Pmbc and Two-pass Amplifying In Erbium-doped Fibermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Dynamic population grating filters have been experimentally demonstrated using two counter-propagating fields in a fiber amplifier [2,3]. This technique makes it possible to obtain a filter with variable parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%