2018
DOI: 10.1111/ojoa.12156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loose Howe; A North Yorkshire Log Coffin Boat Burial(s) Revisited

Abstract: Summary In 1937 a large barrow in north‐east Yorkshire was excavated by Mrs H. W. and Dr F. Elgee. A primary deposit comprising a ‘canoe’‐shaped log coffin and what were described as two ‘log boats’ or ‘canoes’ was uncovered beneath the mound. The burial did not survive; however, the ‘canoe’‐shaped coffin was found to contain an Early Bronze Age Merthyr Mawr‐type dagger, flints and some hazelnuts. Subsequently, a cremation was inserted into the top of the mound. This was accompanied by a Camerton‐Snowshill‐typ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The biological sex of the burial is not known, however, radiocarbon dating of the hazelnuts produced an estimate for the date of the burial in 1975–1865 cal bc ( 64% probability , or 2015–2000 cal bc 2% probability , or 1850–1770 cal bc 30% probability ; SUERC-69042 ; Fig. 3; Jones et al 2019). A re-evaluation of the site archive suggests that the barrow made have been disturbed and there were in fact two log coffin burials in the mound, only one of which was associated with artefacts.…”
Section: Regional Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biological sex of the burial is not known, however, radiocarbon dating of the hazelnuts produced an estimate for the date of the burial in 1975–1865 cal bc ( 64% probability , or 2015–2000 cal bc 2% probability , or 1850–1770 cal bc 30% probability ; SUERC-69042 ; Fig. 3; Jones et al 2019). A re-evaluation of the site archive suggests that the barrow made have been disturbed and there were in fact two log coffin burials in the mound, only one of which was associated with artefacts.…”
Section: Regional Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%