2012
DOI: 10.1097/qad.0b013e328353b066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy after virologic failure of first-line antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings

Abstract: Objective To evaluate virologic response rates of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy as second-line antiretroviral treatment (ART) among adults in resource-limited settings (RLS). Design Open-label pilot study of LPV/r monotherapy in participants on first-line non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor 3-drug combination ART with plasma HIV-1 RNA 1000–200 000 copies/mL. Methods Participants were recruited from 5 sites in Africa and Asia within the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) network. All par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…29,30 In children, this strategy has been evaluated in virologically suppressed children, with promising results. 31 PI monotherapy would have several advantages such as fewer pills, fewer drug interactions, and less NRTIassociated toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…29,30 In children, this strategy has been evaluated in virologically suppressed children, with promising results. 31 PI monotherapy would have several advantages such as fewer pills, fewer drug interactions, and less NRTIassociated toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Several previous, noncomparative studies and one small, randomized study have suggested that protease-inhibitor monotherapy may be promising for second-line therapy in resource-limited settings. [26][27][28] The other small 48-week comparative trial in Thailand showed that protease-inhibitor monotherapy was inferior to protease-inhibitor therapy plus NRTIs on the basis of lower rates of viral-load suppression to a level under 50 copies per milliliter (with only a trend toward lower rates of suppression to a level under 400 copies per milliliter and little protease-inhibitor resistance). 29 Since outcomes with protease-inhibitor monotherapy are better when treatment is initiated after viral-load suppression, 6,30,31 we used an induction approach with raltegravir.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Furthermore, very little of the currently available literature describes second-line ART outcomes in HIV-infected patients in Asia. 6, 8-10 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%