1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0370-2693(89)80027-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lorentz algebra and critical dimension for the bosonic membrane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bosonic case yields D = 27. We have shown why non-critical W ∞ (super) strings are devoid of BRST anomalies in dimensions D = 27, 11, respectively, and which coincide with the critical (super) membrane dimensions D = 27, 11 found by [69], [70]. For this reason we believe that the quantum (super) membrane should contain non-critical (super) W ∞ strings; i.e.…”
Section: Non-critical W ∞ (Super) Strings and The Critical (Super) Mesupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bosonic case yields D = 27. We have shown why non-critical W ∞ (super) strings are devoid of BRST anomalies in dimensions D = 27, 11, respectively, and which coincide with the critical (super) membrane dimensions D = 27, 11 found by [69], [70]. For this reason we believe that the quantum (super) membrane should contain non-critical (super) W ∞ strings; i.e.…”
Section: Non-critical W ∞ (Super) Strings and The Critical (Super) Mesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The purpose of this subsection is to review our proof [66] that non-critical W ∞ (super) strings are devoid of BRST anomalies in dimensions D = 27, 11, respectively, and which coincide with the the critical (super) membrane dimensions D = 27, 11 found by [69], [70]. We deem this review important due to the relationship between the large N limit of Self-Dual SU (N ) Yang-Mills and Self Dual Gravity [71].…”
Section: Non-critical W ∞ (Super) Strings and The Critical (Super) Mementioning
confidence: 78%
“…In string theory the critical dimension such as D = 26 is well-known, it is for example related to Lorentz invariance in the light cone gauge. The critical dimension of the membrane has mainly been discussed with regard to its spectrum [13,14], to the truncated versions of the BRST [15] or the Lorentz algebra [16], where the D = 27 emerges as a necessary condition. Notice however that, it is not clear wether the dimension of embedding space plays as crucial a role for membranes as it does for strings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A natural way to find a critical dimension for the membrane is to relate this latter to the string theory via dimensional reduction [17]. In this string limit, it is natural to obtain D − 1 = 26 for the bosonic membrane, since one of the D dimension in the membrane is absorbed by the gauge freedom [16,[18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [15,16] these critical dimensions were found using Weyl-ordering and point-splitting regularization. In our case the critical dimensions arise from requirement that the (D − 1)-dimensional Lorentz symmetry is non-anomalous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%