2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lorentz Invariance Violation Limits from the Spectral-lag Transition of GRB 190114C

Abstract: The spectral lags of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) have been viewed as the most promising probes of the possible violations of Lorentz invariance (LIV). However, these constraints usually depend on the assumption of the unknown intrinsic time lag in different energy bands and the use of a single highest-energy photon. A new approach to test the LIV effects has been proposed by directly fitting the spectral-lag behavior of a GRB with a well-defined transition from positive lags to negative lags. This method simultane… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
72
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
8
72
3
Order By: Relevance
“…More striking regularity is that 9 out of these 14 photons falls very nicely on a same mainline, giving a strong indication of a light speed variation suppressed by a single power of the Planck scale. 5 It is worth noting that such a LIV scale ( 21) is consistent with various constraints from high-energy γ-ray observations of pulsars [36,37,38,39], active galactic nuclei (AGNs) [40,41,42,43,44] as well as GRBs [6,7,8,45,46,47,48,49,50] and it is also compatible with the strongest robust limit to date [51] from a recent study on 8 Fermi-LAT GRBs with bright emissions in multi-GeV energies [52]. We need to mention that there can be more stringent limits on this characteristic scale of LIV from individual analyses of flaring PKS 2155-304 [53,54], 6 short GRB 090510 [5,56,57] or striking TeV event of GRB 190114C lately found by MAGIC [58,59], which tend to place lower bounds E LIV (0.1 − 10) × E Pl , stronger than that in Eq.…”
Section: Velocity Dispersion Of Light In the D-particle Quantumgravitational Foam Mediumsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…More striking regularity is that 9 out of these 14 photons falls very nicely on a same mainline, giving a strong indication of a light speed variation suppressed by a single power of the Planck scale. 5 It is worth noting that such a LIV scale ( 21) is consistent with various constraints from high-energy γ-ray observations of pulsars [36,37,38,39], active galactic nuclei (AGNs) [40,41,42,43,44] as well as GRBs [6,7,8,45,46,47,48,49,50] and it is also compatible with the strongest robust limit to date [51] from a recent study on 8 Fermi-LAT GRBs with bright emissions in multi-GeV energies [52]. We need to mention that there can be more stringent limits on this characteristic scale of LIV from individual analyses of flaring PKS 2155-304 [53,54], 6 short GRB 090510 [5,56,57] or striking TeV event of GRB 190114C lately found by MAGIC [58,59], which tend to place lower bounds E LIV (0.1 − 10) × E Pl , stronger than that in Eq.…”
Section: Velocity Dispersion Of Light In the D-particle Quantumgravitational Foam Mediumsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Incorporating the LIV effect into the fit, the lower limits of linear and quadratic quantum gravity energy are derived for each burst. The typical lower limits of E QG,1 1.5 × 10 14 GeV and E QG,2 8 × 10 5 GeV of our study are consistent with, and sometimes deeper than, those of previous case studies, such as for GRB 160625B (Wei et al 2017) and GRB 190114C (Du et al 2021).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In order to further constrain the LIV effect, the most optimal use of lag to date has been to fit the keV-MeV multi-wavelength measurements of spectral lags, including their positive-to-negative transitions, with a model incorporating LIV information. A fit of this type yields some deeper limits on the QG energy (see e.g., Wei et al 2017;Du et al 2021). This approach has, however, only been applied in a few GRBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A turn-over presents at the lag v.s. ∆E plot, which has noticed in some other long GRBs (e.g., Wei et al 2017;Du et al 2021).…”
Section: Spectral Lagssupporting
confidence: 55%