Los CIE: una realidad controvertida y compleja

Beilfuss, Markus González

doi:10.24241/anuariocidobinmi.2017.298

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Spanish Immigration Act provides a specific proceeding through which noncitizens who have been issued a deportation order can be subjected to detention in centers of preremoval detention for foreign population ( Centro de Internamiento de Extranjeros , CIE) for processing their forced removal from the country (González‐Beilfuss ). There are currently seven operating CIE that are run and controlled by the Spanish National Police (González‐Beilfuss )…”

Section: Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Across the Sloping Meadow Floor: An Empirical Analysis of Preremoval Detention of Noncitizens

Vallbé¹,

González‐Beilfuss²,

Kalir³

2019

Law Soc Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In many countries, the law permits state authorities to detain noncitizens before deportation. Typically judicial decisions about preremoval detention must be made within a short period of time during which deportable noncitizens are held in police premises, and depending on the country detention may last just one month (e.g., France) or up to 18 months (the Netherlands). While previous research has explored various dimensions of noncitizen detention including the legal procedure, health consequences, the condition of detention centers, and the lives of deportable noncitizens, the empirical assessment of the determinants of decisions on preremoval detention are largely unexplored. Using data from court proceedings of police petitions of detention in Spain and a quantitative strategy, in this article we undertake an empirical analysis of noncitizen detention combining personal background of deportable noncitizens, legal factors of the case, and the behavior of different actors involved in the procedure. To do it, we fit models that take into account variation occurred at judicial district levels. Results indicate, on the one hand, that relevant actors involved in the procedure use different informational cues to decide on cases. On the other hand, the role of prosecutors and attorneys during hearings proves also relevant to predict detention.

show abstract

Section: Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%