Los pagos por servicios ambientales en la Ciudad de México: un enfoque de coherencia de políticas públicas

Arenas, Lucero Cetina; Koff, Harlan; Maganda, Carmen; Almeida-Leñero, Lucía

doi:10.22198/rys2022/34/1601

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Koff (2021) destaca los límites de la evaluación de impacto ambiental en el país que se caracteriza por procesos que socavan la sustentabilidad y de hecho contribuyen al confl icto social. Koff y Maganda (2019) y Cetina Arenas et al (2022) aplican el análisis de coherencia de políticas públicas para el desarrollo a los programas mexicanos de pago por servicios ambientales y muestran cómo estos instrumentos están bien defi nidos normativamente, pero mal integrados en los marcos políticos de México, lo que perjudica su efi cacia.…”

Section: Revisión De Literaturaunclassified

La política climática mexicana en la cuenca del río Usumacinta (1992–2018)

Alvarado¹,

Kauffer²

2023

Regions and Cohesion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since 2005, Mexico has developed a national climate policy aligned with internationally defined parameters. In this article, we analyze the vertical and horizontal coherences in the process of institutionalization of climate policy during the period 1992–2018 in the Usumacinta River Basin, based on the review of laws and actions implemented at national scale, as well as by the federal states and municipalities. The analysis shows vertical coherence at the national-international scale, as well as at the legal level in the state of Chiapas. In terms of horizontal coherence, it points to a series of incoherencies in the state's legal framework and in concrete actions at the river basin scale linked to the vertical incoherencies between the national scale and states located in the river basin. Resumen Desde 2005, México ha desarrollado una política climática nacional acorde con los parámetros definidos en el ámbito internacional. En este artículo analizamos las coherencias verticales y horizontales en el proceso de institucionalización de la política climática durante el periodo 1992–2018 en la cuenca del río Usumacinta a partir de la revisión de leyes y acciones implementadas a escala nacional, así como de los estados federados y municipios. El análisis evidencia coherencias verticales a escala nacional-internacional y en el ámbito legal en el estado de Chiapas. En materia de coherencia horizontal, apunta una serie de incoherencias a escala de la cuenca en el marco legal estatal y en las acciones concretas, vinculadas con las propias incoherencias verticales entre la escala nacional y los estados de la cuenca. Résumé Depuis 2005, le Mexique a mis en œuvre une politique nationale en matière climatique conformément aux paramètres définis à l’échelle internationale. Dans cet article, nous analysons les cohérences verticale et horizontale du processus d'institutionnalisation de la politique climatique durant la période 1992-2018 dans le bassin versant du fleuve Usumacinta sur la base d'un examen des lois et des actions mises en œuvre à l’échelle nationale, des états fédérés et municipale. L'analyse met en évidence des cohérences verticales à l’échelle nationale-internationales et dans le domaine juridique au Chiapas. En termes de cohérence horizontales, elle dévoile un certain nombre d'incohérences juridiques dans les états fédérés et dans les actions concrètes liées aux incohérences verticales entre l’échelle nationale et les états du bassin versant.

show abstract

Section: Revisión De Literaturaunclassified

La política climática mexicana en la cuenca del río Usumacinta (1992–2018)

Alvarado¹,

Kauffer²

2023

Regions and Cohesion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Currently, the 2030 Agenda works in a "top-down" manner as international norms are implemented by nation-states and subsequently, sub-national authorities. Consequently, a centralized sectoral approach to address water objectives prevails (Cetina Arenas et. al., 2022;Pliego Alvarado & Kauffer, 2023).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

International water fora and the prevailing needs for local implementation and broader participation

Ramírez,

Vidriales-Chan

2023

Regions and Cohesion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The United Nations (UN) 2023 Water Conference was held from March 22–24 at the UN Headquarters in New York, USA. There was a clear message from Day 1 of the Conference: “we are not on track to achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6 on water and sanitation for all.” Moreover, business-as-usual approaches for water management do not seem effective facing the so-called triple planetary crisis of climate change, pollution, and biodiversity loss (What is the Triple Planetary Crisis? | UNFCCC). Hence, the Conference aimed to raise awareness of the global water crisis and to make agreements on concerted actions to mobilize all sectors, stakeholders, and countries toward the resolution of this global issue. Among them, the agreement to establish a UN Special Envoy for Water (different figure than the Special Rapporteur on the Human Right to Water), ground more than seven hundred voluntary commitments and pledges, and renew the political momentum in fora such as the High-Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development, held this July 2023, and the SDG Summit in September 2023 to follow up on the SDGs and Agenda 2030, as well as the commitments of the Decade for Action on Water (2018–2028).The UN, in fact, has promoted numerous initiatives to mobilize citizens around the SDGs. Presently, the UN has declared a total of 206 International Environmental Days to honor specific human and environmental subjects. Among them, only 40 are specifically related to the environment or socio-environmental issues. The majority of all of these declarations are followed by “mega-conferences”1 related to the same subjects: that is, RAMSAR/wetlands sites, sustainable development, biodiversity, climate change, and the latest one is water. The UN states that these commemorative dates and fora are meant to “educate the public on issues of concern, to mobilize political will and resources to address global problems, and to celebrate and reinforce achievements of humanity” (United Nations, 2023) ). We have nothing against the raising of awareness and the need to take political action, but we would rather like to offer a reflection on two critical and historical challenges related to these global events: (a) the implementation of global water fora accords from global-to-local governance, and (b) the need for broader and inclusive participation of different stakeholders, with particular focus on water issues.

show abstract