BackgroundIn some nontransplant populations, e ects of di erent antihypertensive drug classes vary. Relative e ects in kidney transplant recipients are uncertain.
ObjectivesTo assess comparative e ects of di erent classes of antihypertensive agents in kidney transplant recipients.
Search methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, conference proceedings and reference lists of identified studies were searched.
Selection criteriaRandomised controlled trials of any antihypertensive agent applied to kidney transplant recipients for at least two weeks were included.
Data collection and analysisData was extracted by two investigators independently. Study quality, transplant outcomes and other patient centred outcomes were assessed using random e ects meta-analysis. Risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean di erence (MD) for continuous outcomes, both with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Stratified analyses and meta-regression were used to investigate heterogeneity.
Main resultsWe identified 60 studies, enrolling 3802 recipients. Twenty-nine studies (2262 participants) compared calcium channel blockers (CCB) to placebo/no treatment, 10 studies (445 participants) compared angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) to placebo/no treatment and seven studies (405 participants) compared CCB to ACEi. CCB compared to placebo/no treatment (plus additional agents in either arm as required) reduced gra loss (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.99) and improved glomerular filtration rate (GFR), (MD, 4.45 mL/min, 95% CI 2.22 to 6.68). Data on ACEi versus placebo/no treatment were inconclusive for GFR (MD -8.07 mL/min, 95% CI -18.57 to 2.43), and variable for gra loss, precluding meta-analysis. In direct comparison with CCB, ACEi decreased GFR (MD -11.48 mL/min, 95% CI -5.75 to -7.21), proteinuria Antihypertensive treatment for kidney transplant recipients (Review)