Losing a partner: the varying financial and practical impacts of bereavement in different sociodemographic groups

Lancaster, Harriet; Johnson, Tom

doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001215

Cited by 10 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An equal division of paid work and care is often an advantage from an individual perspective, especially if a relationship ends. Specialization increases women’s financial dependency on their partners and consequently, the ending of a relationship can be detrimental to women’s household income or pensions when specialization during the relationship was high (Lancaster & Johnson, 2016; Leopold, 2018). However, because our aim is to shed light on what a more (dis)advantageous strategy is for maximizing household earnings, we focus on the period when there are two partners in the household.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Joint Utility or Sub-optimal Outcomes? Household Income Development of Same-Sex and Different-Sex Couples Transitioning to Parenthood in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden

van der Vleuten,

Evertsson,

Moberg

2023

Journal of Family Issues

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Unequal divisions of paid work and care among new parents contribute to increasing inequalities. One explanation for this is joint utility maximization and the benefits of partners (temporarily) specializing in paid work and care. This paper examines the (dis)advantages of specializing compared to dividing tasks more equally by studying whether differences in specialization between same-sex and different-sex couples lead to differences in household earnings after entering parenthood. Using register data from Norway, Finland, Denmark, and Sweden and examining first-time parents, we show that female couples have a more equal within-couple income development during the transition to parenthood than different-sex couples do. However, we find no differences in household income (including or excluding social transfers) between the two types of couples. Although a more equal task division may be preferred from an individual perspective, our results show no evidence of a “best strategy” when it comes to maximizing household income.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%