2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-1433.2010.01221.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Losing Lévi‐Strauss: The 2009 Year in Cultural Anthropology

Abstract: In 2009, Claude Lévi-Strauss died at the age of 100. In this article, I draw on frameworks that were central to his work to structure my discussion of the key themes in cultural anthropology publications over the past year. The four subjects I consider in this review are kinship, taxonomy, bricolage, and traveling.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jessaca Leinaweaver (2010), Hamilton andPlacas (2011), andDole (2012) all explicitly look at work on indigeneity, demonstrating its continued life as foil to anthropological practice and the ways in which indigeneity shifts as traditionalist expectations clash with the transforming lives of those who would be summoned to this category. Addressing a separate theme, Richland (2009), Leinaweaver (2010, Hamilton andPlacas (2011), Muehlebach (2013), and Ashley Carse (2014) note a burgeoning interest in explicitly thinking about the relations that exceed the human. From inquiry in the environment or the anthropocene to multispecies ethnography, from focus on infrastructure to new scientific technologies and their effect on kinship, race, and beyond, previous reviews note the intensified framing of anthropologies beyond the human as new, vital objects of inquiry and sources of future possibility.…”
Section: Previous Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jessaca Leinaweaver (2010), Hamilton andPlacas (2011), andDole (2012) all explicitly look at work on indigeneity, demonstrating its continued life as foil to anthropological practice and the ways in which indigeneity shifts as traditionalist expectations clash with the transforming lives of those who would be summoned to this category. Addressing a separate theme, Richland (2009), Leinaweaver (2010, Hamilton andPlacas (2011), Muehlebach (2013), and Ashley Carse (2014) note a burgeoning interest in explicitly thinking about the relations that exceed the human. From inquiry in the environment or the anthropocene to multispecies ethnography, from focus on infrastructure to new scientific technologies and their effect on kinship, race, and beyond, previous reviews note the intensified framing of anthropologies beyond the human as new, vital objects of inquiry and sources of future possibility.…”
Section: Previous Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hamilton and Placas (2011) track methodological experiments with "natureculture" and, in their discussion of the anthropology of security, track the increasing imperative for anthropology to be "relevant." Leinaweaver (2010) notes innovations in ethnographic technique from collaborative writing projects to new mapping technologies. Muehlebach (2013) notes the increasing precarity of labor practices in our discipline and asks after the reach of the ethical imagination of our discipline.…”
Section: Previous Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article considers the Olympics as a “diagnostic event” (Leinaweaver, 2010: 220; see also Handelman, 1990) for global hierarchies of power, through which global conflicts and controversies coalesce in one of the world’s most internationally visible arenas of expression. Although the Olympics are commonly recognized as a legitimate stage for the articulation of national position (MacAloon, 1984; Price and Dayan, 2008; Roche, 2000), the extent of global approval for this articulation is contingent on the particular configuration of global political ideologies and balances of power at the moment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jessaca Leinaweaver closed 2009's excellent review article, a posthumous discussion of and tribute to Claude Lévi‐Strauss, by expressing curiosity about “what journals, catalogs, and conferences will serve up in 2010 for our consumption—whether raw, cooked, or somewhere in between” (Leinaweaver 2010:223). In this review article, we reflect on particular dimensions of the literature that are either emergent or part of an ongoing dialogue in anthropology and beyond.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%