Losing our Senses, an Exploration of 3D Object Scanning

Eve, Stuart

doi:10.1515/opar-2018-0007

Cited by 19 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Mixed Reality (MR) With exception to 3D printing, many of these datasets are still presented in a 2D format on a computer screen (Ebert et al 2014). The concept of mixed reality (MR) incorporates virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies (Eve 2018). Through VR a user is immersed in real-time in a virtual world via a computer interface, usually using VR goggles or a headset (Eve 2018;Fernandez-Palacios et al 2015).…”

Section: 2mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The concept of mixed reality (MR) incorporates virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies (Eve 2018). Through VR a user is immersed in real-time in a virtual world via a computer interface, usually using VR goggles or a headset (Eve 2018;Fernandez-Palacios et al 2015). Through VR 3D data can be presented complete with depth perception (Raneri 2018).…”

Section: 2mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Conversely in AR, digital objects are be virtually 'inserted' into real-space using a smart device or goggles, this maintains a 1:1 connection to the real-world and creates a multi-sensory experience (Eve 2018;Fernndez-Palacios et al 2015). Additionally, 'virtual-tours' can utilise 360-degree photography to allow users to 'walk' through a scene on a smart device (Tung et al 2015).…”

Section: 2mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The process was demonstrated by Ebert et al (2014) where it was suggested that VR glasses could be used to immerse individuals into 3D interactive forensic scene reconstructions. Literature is also available on the use of VR and AR in archaeology (Eve 2018;Fernndez-Palacios et al 2015) and forensic medicine (Kilgus et al 2014) as well as the use of MR in courtroom display (see 3.4; Ebert et al 2014); it is anticipated that further applications and research will emerge in the near future.…”

Section: 2mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Imaging in forensic science: Five years on

Carew

Errickson

2019

Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging was launched in 2013 with the aim to collate the literature and demonstrate high-quality case studies on image-based modalities across the forensic sciences. Largely, the focus of this journal has been on the transmissive aspect of forensic imaging, and therefore a significant number of high-quality case studies have been published focusing on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. As a result, the 'and imaging' aspect is often neglected. Since 2013, technology has fundamentally evolved, and a number of new techniques have become accessible or have been demonstrated as particularly useful within many sub-disciplines of forensic science. These include active and passive surface scanning techniques, and the availability of three-dimensional printing. Therefore, this article discusses non-contact techniques, their applications, advantages, and considerations on the current state of play of imaging in forensic science. HIGHLIGHTS • We discuss the application of 3D imaging within the context of forensic science. • We highlight the available documentation techniques assessing their advantages and disadvantages. • This article provides several recommendations for future best practice. 1. 'and imaging' aspect is often neglected, despite there being substantial overlap between reflective and transmissive techniques. Numerous forensic science sub-disciplines have utilised these imaging techniques often in an inter-disciplinary manner. These include, but are not limited to, anthropology, archaeology, odontology, crime scene investigation, footwear mark recovery and analysis, courtroom visualisation, and ballistic comparison. Given that these rapidly evolving techniques are situated within the changing face of forensic science, this article has collated the current developments

show abstract

Section: 2mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: 2mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: 2mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: 2mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Imaging in forensic science: Five years on

Carew

Errickson

2019

Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, we do not intend to refer to prosthetics that attempt to simulate isolated senses, such as the virtual cocoon (Chalmers & Zányi 2009), a virtual-reality helmet that stimulated senses by using devices that could generate sound, smell, taste, various temperatures and so on, or the Dead Man's Nose (Eve 2017a), a prototype that emits different smells according to the location of the user. Although some of these, and especially Eve's embodied GIS approach within a Mixed Reality framework (Eve 2017b; 2018), provide a basis for integrating sensorial flows into a dynamic whole, we believe that such approaches do not do justice to the complex processes of experience and perception, and as noted above, treat sensoriality as a matter of bodily organs and isolated interaction devoid of affectivity, within a model of exterior stimuli and interior cognitive processing (see Hamilakis 2013, 106–8, for a critique).…”

Section: Towards Sensorial Digital Archaeologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital Sensoriality: The Neolithic Figurines from Koutroulou Magoula, Greece

Papadopoulos¹,

Hamilakis²,

Kyparissi‐Apostolika³

et al. 2019

CAJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The image-based discourse on clay figurines that treated them as merely artistic representations, the meaning of which needs to be deciphered through various iconological methods, has been severely critiqued and challenged in the past decade. This discourse, however, has largely shaped the way that figurines are depicted in archaeological iterations and publications, and it is this corpus of images that has in turn shaped further thinking and discussion on figurines, especially since very few people are able to handle the original, three-dimensional, physical objects. Building on the changing intellectual climate in figurine studies, we propose here a framework that treats figurines as multi-sensorial, affective and dynamic objects, acting within distinctive, relational fields of sensoriality. Furthermore, we situate a range of digital, computational methods within this framework in an attempt to deprive them of their latent Cartesianism and mentalism, and we demonstrate how we have applied them to the study of Neolithic figurines from the site of Koutroulou Magoula in Greece. We argue that such methodologies, situated within an experiential framework, not only provide new means of understanding, interpretation and dissemination, but, most importantly, enable researchers and the public to explore the sensorial affordances and affective potential of things, in the past as well as in the present.

show abstract