2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2311.2006.00429.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Losing the Plot? Researching Community Safety Partnership Work Against Domestic Violence

Abstract: This article considers the role of feminist community activism and academic research in the context of contemporary crime reduction policy. We draw upon experiences and knowledge gained from our involvement in comprehensive evaluation studies of community responses to domestic violence against women (in two areas of the South East of England) completed in 1996 and in 2004, before and after the present government's crime reduction initiatives. We consider the perils and prospects for academic 'experts' and femi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it has been suggested that the introduction and use of risk assessment tools facilitate a more strategic response to domestic violence incidents (Hoyle, 2008). It is important to note, however, that the benefits associated with the use of specialist police officers are dependent on the availability of adequate resources, and that risk assessment tools have been criticized for being overly prescriptive (Hoyle, 2008; Hoyle & Sanders, 2000; Radford & Gill, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it has been suggested that the introduction and use of risk assessment tools facilitate a more strategic response to domestic violence incidents (Hoyle, 2008). It is important to note, however, that the benefits associated with the use of specialist police officers are dependent on the availability of adequate resources, and that risk assessment tools have been criticized for being overly prescriptive (Hoyle, 2008; Hoyle & Sanders, 2000; Radford & Gill, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results from a checklist are not a definitive assessment of risk' (CAADA: 1). So, although such tools and are clearly illustrative of Carlen's (2008) discussion of 'risk-crazed governance' and may be helpful in informing resource allocation to those deemed 'at risk' (qua Radford andGill, 2006, Robinson, 2010), problems of an appropriately targeted response remain. While what constitutes 'appropriate' is up for grabs, the important point is achieving a policy response that is proportionate to the risk so far as we are able to predict it.…”
Section: The Experiential Narrative: 'Knowing Otherwise'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the increased use of risk assessment is viewed positively by police services, as it can provide a basis for more targeted and efficient responses to IPV (Radford & Gill, 2006;Hoyle, 2008;Grant & Rowe, 2011). An effective response to IPV involves a combination of risk assessment, risk management, and safety planning.…”
Section: Police Risk Management and Safety Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%