2019 North American Power Symposium (NAPS) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/naps46351.2019.9000389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss Locational Sensitivity in Distribution Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The control variables in this case are both active and reactive power change. In [46]- [49], NSFs are computed considering peak demand at a particular node. This can also be extended to accommodate time-series analysis with a given consumption profile [50].…”
Section: Nodal Sensitivity Factors (Nsfs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control variables in this case are both active and reactive power change. In [46]- [49], NSFs are computed considering peak demand at a particular node. This can also be extended to accommodate time-series analysis with a given consumption profile [50].…”
Section: Nodal Sensitivity Factors (Nsfs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here in the presented formulation, a fictitious node (a dummy node) m with a fictitious variable V s is assigned on the secondary side of the transformer to relates the relationship of voltage and power flow between the LTC and its associated distribution branch. The presumed ideal transformer has no power losses between its terminal nodes i and m 26‐28 . The voltage ratio of the secondary‐side m to the primary‐side i is equal to the transformer turns ratio frakturt, and the voltage angles of both nodes are the same.…”
Section: Distribution Systems Vvo Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%