SAE Technical Paper Series 1980
DOI: 10.4271/801135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss Model for Off-Design Performance Analysis of Radial Turbines with Pivoting-Vane, Variable-Area Stators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Past efforts to develop performance prediction methods for radial inflow turbines mostly concentrated on the combination of one-dimensional flow analysis and appropriate loss models [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] in the scroll, vaned and/or vaneless nozzle, rotor and the exit duct.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past efforts to develop performance prediction methods for radial inflow turbines mostly concentrated on the combination of one-dimensional flow analysis and appropriate loss models [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] in the scroll, vaned and/or vaneless nozzle, rotor and the exit duct.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The penalty induced by the spacers and the clearances is far more important in the closed configuration than in the fully opened one. This has already been explained long ago by [19] since the relative importance of the clearances increases as the throat section of the nozzle decreases. In response to the alteration of both the mass-flow and the efficiency levels, the reactivity of the stage is modified as presented in Figure 5(b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…First, the turbine map is stretched along the corrected mass flow (ϕ) axis according to the percentage of the vanes' opening. Secondly, an efficiency decrement is added to the U/Co departure [42]. The outlet pressure is set at what is required for exhausting the gas, and the mach speed is found such that the turbine may operate at highest efficiency.…”
Section: Model Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%