2003
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0609.2003.00007.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss of CD20 expression in relapsed lymphomas after rituximab therapy

Abstract: The response rate at relapse to rituximab in prior responders B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients is below 50%. Loss of CD20 expression after rituximab therapy may explain this secondary resistance. However, the frequency of CD20 negative relapses cannot be assessed since most patients that relapsed after rituximab therapy have not been re-biopsied. Here, we present two patients with CD20 positive low grade B-cell NHL that lost the cell surface and cytoplasmic expression at relapse after rituximab the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, a subset of responsive patients develops or acquires resistance to further treatment and the mechanism of resistance in this subset is also not clear. There have been some reports suggesting the modulation of CD20 expression and/or circulating CD20 as responsible for unresponsiveness (Haidar et al, 2003;Manshouri et al, 2003;Kennedy et al, 2004). Based on our findings described above, we hypothesized that the development/ acquisition of rituximab resistance may have emanated from perturbations of tumor cells survival signaling pathways and failure of rituximab to alter these pathways.…”
Section: Underlying Mechanisms Of the Development Of Rituximab Resistmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Further, a subset of responsive patients develops or acquires resistance to further treatment and the mechanism of resistance in this subset is also not clear. There have been some reports suggesting the modulation of CD20 expression and/or circulating CD20 as responsible for unresponsiveness (Haidar et al, 2003;Manshouri et al, 2003;Kennedy et al, 2004). Based on our findings described above, we hypothesized that the development/ acquisition of rituximab resistance may have emanated from perturbations of tumor cells survival signaling pathways and failure of rituximab to alter these pathways.…”
Section: Underlying Mechanisms Of the Development Of Rituximab Resistmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[20][21][22] Tissue obtained from patients with primary DLBCL at the time of relapse is rare because most patients undergo fine needle aspiration to confirm relapse or have no biopsy. Thus the true incidence of CD20-negative relapses is unknown.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because scFvRit:sFasL directly induces apoptosis, which solely requires the cross-linking of CD20 and Fas, scFvRit:sFasL may be particularly relevant for patients with poor or absent complementdependent cytotoxicity. In addition, treatment with rituximab has been proposed to lead to the development of CD20-negative relapses in some patients, possibly due to tumor cell heterogeneity (25,26). For scFvRit:sFasL, the reciprocal activation of Fas by CD20-immobilized scFvRit:sFasL opens up the possibility to induce apoptosis in neighboring FasL-sensitive leukemic cells that have lost CD20 expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%