1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00295-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss of chromosome 1p may have a prognostic value in localised Neuroblastoma: results of the French NBL 90 study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Between March 1990 and September 1999, all cases of localized neuroblastoma treated at 31 centers of The French Society of Pediatric Oncology (SFOP) were included in two consecutive prospective multicenter studies. In the first study (NBL90) [7][8][9][10], patients with localized NB were treated by primary surgery if complete gross resection was considered as feasible without mortality or major functional morbidity but no specific criteria of resectability were used to select patients. Overall in the first study (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between March 1990 and September 1999, all cases of localized neuroblastoma treated at 31 centers of The French Society of Pediatric Oncology (SFOP) were included in two consecutive prospective multicenter studies. In the first study (NBL90) [7][8][9][10], patients with localized NB were treated by primary surgery if complete gross resection was considered as feasible without mortality or major functional morbidity but no specific criteria of resectability were used to select patients. Overall in the first study (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic abnormalities at chromosome 1p (Rubie et al, 1997a), 3p, 11q (Spitz et al, 2003;Attiyeh et al, 2005;Simon et al, 2006) and 17q (Brinkschmidt et al, 2001), as well as biochemical (Simon et al, 2003), histological (Perez et al, 2000;Navarro et al, 2006;Sano et al, 2006), and biological factors (Christiansen et al, 1995;Cheung et al, 1997;Kramer et al, 1997;Perez et al, 2000;Ladenstein et al, 2001;Mora et al, 2001;Krams et al, 2003;Riley et al, 2004;Haber et al, 2006;Spitz et al, 2006), do not seem to have the same relevance in patients with localised NB as they do in patients with metastatic disease. Gene expression profiling and GCH studies have suggested specific favourable and unfavourable NB signatures (Takita et al, 2004;Ohira et al, 2005;Vandesompele et al, 2005), but presently a widespread identification of patients at risk of relapse by these techniques cannot be envisaged.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been ongoing controversy about the precise prognostic power of 1p deletion in relation to other variables, particularly MYCN [15,40]. Some studies showed that an inverse relationship exists between 11q loss and amplification of MYCN, indicating that these abnormalities represent distinct genetic subtypes of advanced-stage NB [38]; multiple studies found a significant association between 11q, 3p, and 14q loss [49][50][51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%