2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-007-0439-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss of CO from the intravascular bed and its impact on the optimised CO-rebreathing method

Abstract: Total haemoglobin mass can be easily measured by applying the optimised CO-rebreathing method (oCOR-method). Prerequisite for its accurate determination is a homogenous CO distribution in the blood and the exact knowledge of the CO volume circulating in the vascular space. The aim of the study was to evaluate the mixing time of CO in the blood after inhaling a CO-bolus and to quantify the CO volume leaving the vascular bed due to diffusion to myoglobin and due to exhalation during processing the oCOR-method. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
159
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
11
159
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where K ϭ (ambient barometric pressure mmHg ϫ 273 o K)/(760 mmHg ϫ ambient temperature o K); MCO is CO volume administered into the system minus CO volume not bound to hemoglobin (calculated as the sum of CO volume remaining in the spirometer and the lung, as well as CO volume exhaled during the 7 min between disconnecting the subject from the spirometer and the final blood sample), which was then multiplied by 0.99 to correct for 1% loss of the CO dose to myoglobin (2,16); ⌬%HbCO is the difference between %HbCO at baseline and %HbCO in the blood samples 9 min after CO administration; and 1.39 is Hüfner's value for the CO binding capacity of hemoglobin (1.39 ml/g) (8). The 9-min concentration was calculated as the mean of the 8-and 10-min blood samples.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where K ϭ (ambient barometric pressure mmHg ϫ 273 o K)/(760 mmHg ϫ ambient temperature o K); MCO is CO volume administered into the system minus CO volume not bound to hemoglobin (calculated as the sum of CO volume remaining in the spirometer and the lung, as well as CO volume exhaled during the 7 min between disconnecting the subject from the spirometer and the final blood sample), which was then multiplied by 0.99 to correct for 1% loss of the CO dose to myoglobin (2,16); ⌬%HbCO is the difference between %HbCO at baseline and %HbCO in the blood samples 9 min after CO administration; and 1.39 is Hüfner's value for the CO binding capacity of hemoglobin (1.39 ml/g) (8). The 9-min concentration was calculated as the mean of the 8-and 10-min blood samples.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During a visit to the laboratory either a day before or after the exercise-hypoxia test, total hemoglobin mass was assessed using CO rebreathing (COR) as described in detail by Schmidt and Prommer (2005) and modified by Prommer and Schmidt (2007). In brief, after 15-min resting in a sitting position, the subjects were connected to a specially designed closed spirometric system allowing a CO-bolus application, followed by 2 min rebreathing of approximately 3 L amount of oxygen.…”
Section: Total Hemoglobin Mass Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The software program SpiCO corrects for the loss of CO from hemoglobin to myoglobin according to the findings of Schmidt and Prommer (2005) and by Prommer and Schmidt (2007) by 0.3% of administered CO per minute. The calculation of EV = (644 x Hct (%) x [Hb] -1 (g/L)) x tHb-mass (mmol) is based on the equations 1-3 presented by Burge and Skinner (1995).…”
Section: Total Hemoglobin Mass Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If erythrocytes remain pooled in lower extremities during a CO re-breathing procedure they cannot be tagged with CO which may lead to an underestimation of Hb mass . Complete blood mixing has previously been suggested to occur within 6 to 10 min based on similar %HbCO values in blood samples obtained from the radial artery, earlobe capillaries and an antecubital vein (Garvican et al 2010;Prommer and Schmidt 2007). These studies however all failed to include blood sampling from large pooling veins of the lower body where turnover is known to be much slower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%