1993
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1993.184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss of constitutional heterozygosity on chromosomes 5 and 17 in cholangiocarcinoma

Abstract: It has been established that loss of tumour suppressor genes is crucial in carcinogenesis. There has been no reported study on searching for tumour suppressor genes in cholangiocarcinomas as yet. In order to investigate the loss of heterozygosity (LOH), which may represent such gene loss, in cholangiocarcinoma, we studied 14 patients with this tumour using restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Twenty-two probes assigned to chromosomes 1, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17 and 18 were used. Allelic lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Somatic mutations and lost of heterozygosity of APC were reported for colorectal, gastric, pancreatic and cholangiocarcinomas. 19,20 To our knowledge, ours is the first investigation of loss of heterozygosity and microsatellite instability in the APC locus in malignant melanomas. In total, 80% of cases with an instable APC locus did not show any APC expression on the protein level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Somatic mutations and lost of heterozygosity of APC were reported for colorectal, gastric, pancreatic and cholangiocarcinomas. 19,20 To our knowledge, ours is the first investigation of loss of heterozygosity and microsatellite instability in the APC locus in malignant melanomas. In total, 80% of cases with an instable APC locus did not show any APC expression on the protein level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The marker pairs selected for HCC (74 markers from 17 chromosomal arms) included 1p (D1S160, D1S163, D1S170, D1S186, MYCL), 3p (D3S1317), 4p (D4S394), 4q (D4S398, D4S395, D4S392, D4S422, FGA, FABP2, D4S427, D4S415, D4S1615, D4S1554, D4S1426, D4S1598, D4S620, D4S1566, D4S1545, D4S2920, D4S2943, D4S2954), 5q (D5S409), 6q (D6S264), 8p (D8S261, D8S277), 8q (D8S85, D8S200, D8S555, D8S283), 9p (D9S169, D9S1747, D9S104), 10q (D10S109), 11p (D11S554, D11S436, D11S1344, D11S932, D11S1324), 11q (D11S938, D11S29), 12p (D12S93), 13q (D13S171, D13S153, Rb1, D13S133, D13S227, D13S159, D13S166, D13S168), 14q (D14S72, D14S51), 16p (D16S419, D16S409, D16S3106, D16S498), 16q (D16S415, D16S408, D16S512, D16S289, D16S402, D16S516, D16S422, D16S413), and 17p (D17S520, D17S1176, TP53, D17S513, D17S578, D17S796, D17S849) based on previous reports (Yeh et al, 1996;Nagai et al, 1997;Piao et al, 1998;Fujii et al, 2000;Okabe et al, 2000;Yeh et al, 2001). The marker pairs selected for CC (35 markers from 16 chromosomal arms) included 2p (BAT-26), 3p (D3S3667, D3S1578, D3S3582, D3S3560, D3S1581, D3S3729, D3S1588, D3S3648), 4 (D4S415, D4S413), 5q (D5S323, D5S417), 6p (D6S263), 6q (D6S292), 7q (D7S495, D7S486), 9p (D9S747, D9S171), 11p (D11S907, D11S569), 14q (D14S1436), 16q (D16S3094, D16S511, D16S534, D16S520), 17 (D17S695), 18q (D18S67, D18S51, D18S535), 20 (D20S85), 21q (D21S1245, D21S1436, D21S1270), and Xp (DXS538) (Ding et al, 1993;Fujii et al, 2000). All of the tumours, irrespective of histopathology, were analysed for a total of 109 microsatellite markers (74 markers for HCC and 35 markers for CC) to confirm the specificity of chromosomal alterations as well as their presence in the serum as tumour markers.…”
Section: Analysis For Allelic Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include frequent deletions of 5q in leukaemias and translocations associated with lymphoma (Willman et al 1993). In addition, loss of heterozygosity at 5q35-qter has been found in hepatocellular carcinomas that are not associated with hepatitis B virus infection (Ding et al 1991) and in cholangiocarcinoma (Ding et al 1993). It will be of interest to determine whether a relationship exists between the CLIO0 MAP kinase phosphatase and these cancers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%