2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss of ecosystem services and the decapitalization of nature in El Salvador

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ecosystem services (ES), defined as “the benefits that people obtain from ecosystems” ([ 1 ]: p.630, [ 2 ]: p.40), are fundamental for society [ 3 , 4 ]. ES improve human well-being and environmental quality in several ways, for example, by capturing air pollutants and/or providing fresh water (regulating ES), as well as through economic benefits such as those obtained from access to goods for subsistence or for the generation of wealth (provisioning ES).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecosystem services (ES), defined as “the benefits that people obtain from ecosystems” ([ 1 ]: p.630, [ 2 ]: p.40), are fundamental for society [ 3 , 4 ]. ES improve human well-being and environmental quality in several ways, for example, by capturing air pollutants and/or providing fresh water (regulating ES), as well as through economic benefits such as those obtained from access to goods for subsistence or for the generation of wealth (provisioning ES).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In El Salvador, the loss of species follows the global trend but at an exacerbated level. Only 1% of its territory remains as a primary ecosystem and the vast majority can be categorized as collapsed, endangered, or critically endangered (Crespin & Simonetti, 2015), mainly as the result of change in land use, caused by the increase in agroproductive systems and urban areas (Crespin & Simonetti, 2016). These factors stand as the main source of freshwater ichthyofauna extinction (Sala et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, using data from Latin America only would limit both the number of 'biomes' and the ecosystem services that could be assessed. When data from equivalent sites are not available (as it is the case here), using generalised values are more likely to reduce biases (Richardson and others 2015;Crespin and Simonetti 2016).…”
Section: Caveats Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine whether variations in the coefficient values would result in unacceptable uncertainties associated with the unit value transfer. The coefficient values used to estimate the ESV of the four LULC classes (water, grassland, shrublands and arboreal vegetation) were adjusted by 50%, and the coefficient sensitivity (CS) was calculated using equation (2) following the standard economic concept of elasticity (Mansfield 1985), as proposed by Kreuter and others (2001) and applied by many (for example, Li and others 2007;Hu and others 2008;Crespin and Simonetti 2016;Kindu and others 2016).…”
Section: Estimating the Ecosystem Services Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation