Purpose: Several models of cancer progression, including clonal evolution, parallel evolution, and same-gene models, have been proposed to date. The purpose of this study is to investigate the authenticity of these models by comparison of accumulated genetic alterations between primary and corresponding metastatic lung cancers. Experimental Design: A whole-genome allelic imbalance scanning using a high-resolution single nucleotide polymorphism array and mutational analysis of the p53, EGFR, and KRAS genes were done on eight sets of primary and metastatic lung cancers. Based on the genotype data, the natural history of each case was deduced, and candidate metastasis suppressor loci were determined. Results: Five to 20 chromosomal regions showed allelic imbalance in each tumor. Accumulated genetic alterations were similar between primary and corresponding metastatic tumors, and the majority(>67%) of genetic alterations detected in metastatic tumors was also detected in the corresponding primary tumors. On the other hand, in seven of the eight cases, there were genetic alterations accumulated only in metastatic tumors. Among these alterations, allelic imbalances at chromosome 11p15 and 11p11-p13 regions were the most frequent ones (4 of 8, 50%). Likewise, four cases showed genetic alterations detected only in primary tumors. Conclusions: The natural history of each case indicated that the process of metastasis varies among cases, and that all three models are applicable to lung cancer progression. According to the clonal and parallel evolution models, it is possible that a metastasis suppressor gene(s) for lung cancer is present on chromosome 11p.Metastasis is a principal event leading to death in individuals with cancer. However, the molecular basis of metastasis is still unclear. A generally accepted model for tumor progression is the ''clonal evolution'' model. This model is well illustrated in colorectal carcinogenesis (1) and holds that more malignant cells with additional genetic alterations predominate in a tumor cell population. In this model, metastasis represents the end stage of evolution, and the presence of genetic alterations responsible for the metastatic ability of tumor cells is predicted. The finding that primary tumor cell populations are comprised of cells with different metastatic abilities supports this model (2). If tumor cells with such genetic alterations consist of a small subpopulation among the primary tumor cells, these alterations can be detected only in metastatic tumors but not (or hardly) detected in the corresponding primary tumor (3 -5). In fact, we and others identified several genetic alterations that were detected only in metastatic tumors but not in the corresponding primary tumors (6 -12), supporting the authenticity of this model.Recently, other models for tumor progression and metastasis were also proposed. One is ''the parallel evolution model,'' which proposes early occurrence of metastasis and parallel evolution of primary and metastatic tumors (13). This was ba...