2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss of topographic specificity of LTD-like plasticity is a trait marker in focal dystonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that focal hand dystonia is associated with a dysfunctional homeostatic regulation of plasticity, which might set the frame for aberrant sensorimotor plasticity. Indeed, several NTBS studies have shown that patients with focal hand dystonia show excessive sensorimotor plasticity with lack of somatotopic specificity [129,130]. It should be noted though that focal dystonia is also characterized by deficient inhibition within intracortical circuits [131].…”
Section: Focal Dystoniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest that focal hand dystonia is associated with a dysfunctional homeostatic regulation of plasticity, which might set the frame for aberrant sensorimotor plasticity. Indeed, several NTBS studies have shown that patients with focal hand dystonia show excessive sensorimotor plasticity with lack of somatotopic specificity [129,130]. It should be noted though that focal dystonia is also characterized by deficient inhibition within intracortical circuits [131].…”
Section: Focal Dystoniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been shown that an ISI of 21.5 ms may have similar effects (Weise et al, 2006, 2011). Such increases can however also be obtained when a fixed inter-stimulus interval (ISI) of 35 ms is employed (Stefan et al, 2000).…”
Section: Timing Dependency In Pasmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In order to induce LTD-type effects in corticospinal projections to the hand (Table 2), it has been customary to employ a fixed ISI of 10 ms (“PAS10”), with a view to ensuring that a corollary of the afferent volley arrives at M1 after the magnetic cortical stimulus (e.g., Wolters et al, 2003; Monte-Silva et al, 2009; Thirugnanasambandam et al, 2011a,b; Weise et al, 2011). In a recent study however, Schabrun et al (2013) reported that MEP amplitudes were reduced by a PAS protocol in which electrical stimulation of the median nerve was applied at fixed intervals of 250, 350, and 450 ms following the delivery of TMS to contralateral M1.…”
Section: Timing Dependency In Pasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 ms interval – PAS 10 ), excitability decreases [18]. Secondly, the change in excitability is specific to the cortical representation of the stimulated cutaneous region [17][19]. Thirdly, both LTP-like and LTD-like plasticity is likely mediated by synapses of excitatory neurons [20], [21] and cannot be induced if NMDA receptors are blocked [18], [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%