Loss of viability ofBacteroides fragilis andBacteroides vulgatus in different media

Vught, A Verweij-Van; Sparrius, M.; Maclaren, D. M.

doi:10.1007/bf02148706

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A difference in the ability of ABE (WC broth) to support the growth of B. fragilis isolates compared with the 7D broth was demonstrated. Others have reported differences in the growth rate of B. fragilis strains caused by differences in media (6,18,25). The poor growth observed in ABE was also associated with diminished bactericidal activity of cefoxitin.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 96%

Comparison of kill-kinetic studies with agar and broth microdilution methods for determination of antimicrobial activity of selected agents against members of the Bacteroides fragilis group

Stratton¹,

Weeks²,

Aldridge³

1987

J Clin Microbiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Kill-kinetic studies often are used to determine the rate and degree of kiling of aerobic bacteria by antimicrobial agents. Few studies, however, make use of this method for determining antimicrobial activity against anaerobic bacteria. To evaluate kill-kinetic studies for anaerobes, kill-kinetic studies were performed for selected antimicrobial agents against members of the Bacteroides fragilis group and compared with MICs obtained by using a reference agar dilution method and a broth microdilution method. Results of the kill-kinetic studies showed that the degree of killing over a 24-h test period was related to the MIC for the test organism. In general, the higher the MIC of an antimicrobial agent for a test organism, the less the killing observed. In addition, these studies demonstrate subtle differences in bactericidal activity at various concentrations of the antimicrobial agents, which cannot be determined by agar or broth dilution methods. Kill-kinetic studies are a useful addition to dilution methods for the evaluation of antimicrobial agents against anaerobes.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 96%