2012 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems 2012
DOI: 10.1109/iscas.2012.6271718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Losses analysis and low standby losses quasi-resonant flyback converter design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The bigger the voltage V DS is, the more obvious the loss is. A valley detection circuit is designed to detect the voltage valley of the drain and turns the power FET on at the valley so the conduction loss decreases and the efficiency increases [4] . As demonstrated in Fig.…”
Section: A Qr Mode Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bigger the voltage V DS is, the more obvious the loss is. A valley detection circuit is designed to detect the voltage valley of the drain and turns the power FET on at the valley so the conduction loss decreases and the efficiency increases [4] . As demonstrated in Fig.…”
Section: A Qr Mode Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, QR control provides higher efficiency compared with fixed frequency controls. However, the QR control has its own limitations and drawbacks, such as preventing CCM at high load [10], lower efficiency at light load [11] and a wide range of operating frequencies, especially at both 220 and 110 V inputs [8]. The duty cycle D on is set by the turns ratio of the primary and secondary windings (N p and N s for the primary and secondary number of turns, respectively) and the converter input and output voltages (V in and V o ), as shown in (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The universally compatible flyback converter needs devices and components to withstand both high‐voltage stresses when using at HL and high‐current stress when using at LL, which results in difficulties in choosing suitable devices and components without compromise of the efficiency and cost. Nowadays, the need for higher efficiency is increasing with efficiency regulation policies, such as energy star and consumer electronics control (CEC), requiring a minimum efficiency of 84–87% [10, 11]. Typical mass production flyback converters are usually about 85% efficiency, particularly at HL operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endüstride birçok alanda yoğun bir şekilde kullanılan geri dönüşlü (Flyback) DC-DC dönüştürücü devresinin en önemli avantajlarından biri, giriş ve çıkış gerilimleri arasında elektriksel izolasyonun olmasıdır. Geri dönüşlü DC-DC dönüştürücü devresi diğer izoleli DC-DC dönüştürücü türlerine göre yapısının basit olması, maliyetinin düşük olması gibi avantajlarından dolayı daha çok tercih edilmektedir [3][4][5][6]. Bu avantajların yanında transformatör kullanımındaki sınırlamalar nedeniyle düşük güçlü uygulamalarda kullanılır.…”
Section: Gi̇ri̇ş (Introduction)unclassified