Lost and Found in Upstate New York: Exploring the Motivations of “Lost Boys” Refugees as Founders of International Nonprofit Organizations

Appe, Susan; Oreg, Ayelet

doi:10.1177/0095399719890311

Cited by 11 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Specifically, all NGO groups are significantly less likely to operate in countries with a common official language, and none of the NGO groups appear to allocate aid based upon the size of immigrant communities within Canada. This non‐finding is counterintuitive, as there has been significant discussion of the potential influence of diaspora groups in homeland development in recent years (Appe & Oreg, 2019; Brinkerhoff, 2012; Büthe et al, 2012; Schnable, 2015). This may indicate that common cultural systems and personal connections through immigration do not hold as much sway over the work of Canadian NGOs and particularly GINGOs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Need, Merit, Self‐Interest or Convenience? Exploring Aid Allocation Motives of Grassroots International NGOs

Davis

Swiss

2020

J of Intl Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite substantial scholarly attention given to aid allocation motives of state agencies and professionalized non‐governmental organizations (NGOs), privately funded grassroots international NGOs (GINGOs), which have rapidly emerged in the global North, have escaped academic analysis. Using an original dataset of 948 Canadian NGOs, this study compares country aid allocation patterns along competing variables of need, merit, self‐interest and convenience between professionalized, mid‐sized independent and grassroots international NGOs. Our results underscore the importance of a disaggregated analysis yet reveal similar aid allocation trends between all three NGO groups and show significant herding behaviour. These findings question the added value of the growing phenomena of GINGOs. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Need, Merit, Self‐Interest or Convenience? Exploring Aid Allocation Motives of Grassroots International NGOs

Davis

Swiss

2020

J of Intl Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The role of community-based organizations in disaster management and the engagement of diverse communities in planning for disasters further underscores the significance of inclusive and participatory approaches in American democracy (Jung & Ha, 2021). Moreover, the engagement of refugees in establishing and leading nonprofit organizations in the United States demonstrates the potential for diverse communities to actively contribute to civic engagement and social welfare (Appe & Oreg, 2019).…”

Section: The United States: a Democratic Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Community engagement in local governance: A review of USA and African strategies

Justice Chika Igbokwe,

Rosita Ebere Daraojimba,

Beatrice Adedayo Okunade

et al. 2024

World J. Adv. Res. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Community engagement in local governance is a crucial aspect of fostering inclusive and participatory decision-making processes. This paper explores and compares community engagement strategies in the United States and Africa, shedding light on the diverse approaches employed to enhance citizen involvement in local governance. In the United States, community engagement is deeply rooted in democratic principles, with a strong emphasis on transparency and collaboration between local governments and residents. Strategies such as town hall meetings, public forums, and online platforms are commonly used to facilitate dialogue and gather input from community members. The U.S. model also emphasizes the importance of community-based organizations, which play a vital role in advocating for the interests of local residents. This review delves into the effectiveness of these strategies, examining their impact on policy development and the overall governance landscape. In contrast, African countries exhibit a rich tapestry of community engagement strategies shaped by diverse cultural, social, and political contexts. Community assemblies, traditional councils, and community-based participatory approaches are often employed to integrate the voices of citizens into decision-making processes. The paper explores the challenges and opportunities associated with these strategies, considering factors such as cultural diversity, historical context, and the role of traditional leadership in African governance. Despite these regional differences, common themes emerge, emphasizing the importance of building trust, promoting inclusivity, and leveraging technology to enhance community engagement. Both the U.S. and African strategies face challenges such as overcoming socio-economic disparities, addressing power imbalances, and ensuring the meaningful inclusion of marginalized groups. The paper examines innovative initiatives and best practices that have emerged from both contexts, providing valuable insights for policymakers, practitioners, and scholars interested in strengthening community engagement in local governance. This review contributes to the understanding of community engagement in local governance by drawing on examples from the United States and Africa. By highlighting the diversity of strategies and identifying common principles, the paper aims to inform future research, policy development, and practical initiatives aimed at fostering robust and inclusive local governance worldwide.

show abstract

Collaborative governance in disaster management and sustainable development

Dai,

Azhar

2024

Public Admin & Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review article highlights the outcomes of collaborative governance in disaster management and its correlation with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Of particular interests are the origins and emergence of scholarship, core themes discussed under the subject, global contexts reported in the studies, and empirical findings regarding the relationship between collaborative governance in disaster management and the SDGs. The findings indicate that the USA dominates in publications on collaborative governance in disaster management. The most reported areas include COVID‐19, general theory development, the role of nonprofits, policy development frameworks, and other disasters including Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The areas connected with the SDGs are grouped into three sections. The first section describes the study's focus on SDG 17, highlighting partnerships as pivotal for goal attainment; the second section examines the Sendai Framework's alignment with goals such as poverty eradication, urban resilience, climate action, and partnerships; while the third section addresses additional areas connected to foundational SDGs, outlining a comprehensive framework for collaborative governance research. The study concludes by proposing a research agenda for more research from multiple contexts and research on areas under a developmental agenda.

show abstract

Lost and Found in Upstate New York: Exploring the Motivations of “Lost Boys” Refugees as Founders of International Nonprofit Organizations

Cited by 11 publications

References 57 publications

Need, Merit, Self‐Interest or Convenience? Exploring Aid Allocation Motives of Grassroots International NGOs

Need, Merit, Self‐Interest or Convenience? Exploring Aid Allocation Motives of Grassroots International NGOs

Community engagement in local governance: A review of USA and African strategies

Collaborative governance in disaster management and sustainable development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About