2004
DOI: 10.1525/jlca.2004.9.1.179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lost in Mayaland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the realm of study called Maya archaeology, there has been limited acknowledgment of or reckoning with the processes of colonialism and their contributions to disciplinary roots and research methods (for notable exceptions, see the work of Indigenous scholars, including A. Cojtí Ren, 2006; I. Cojtí Ren, 2010; Cuxil, 2010; see also Clark and Anderson, 2015; Henderson and Hudson, 2015; Joyce, 2008; Pezzarossi, 2020). More frequently, researchers working in adjacent regions and subfields have drawn attention to problematic disciplinary histories and their continuing influence on archaeological and heritage discourses and practice (e.g., Armstrong‐Fumero, 2018; Breglia, 2006; Browman, 2011; Castañeda, 1996; Castillo Cocom, 2004; Euraque, 1998; Evans, 2004; Montejo, 2005; Palacios, 2012; Wainwright, 2008). Accounts of the past generated by archaeologists include discourses that assume incommensurability or static continuity between ancient and contemporary Indigenous peoples of the region (McAnany and Gallareta Negrón, 2010; Pezzarossi, 2020; Pyburn, 2006; Zimmermann et al., 2020, 664).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the realm of study called Maya archaeology, there has been limited acknowledgment of or reckoning with the processes of colonialism and their contributions to disciplinary roots and research methods (for notable exceptions, see the work of Indigenous scholars, including A. Cojtí Ren, 2006; I. Cojtí Ren, 2010; Cuxil, 2010; see also Clark and Anderson, 2015; Henderson and Hudson, 2015; Joyce, 2008; Pezzarossi, 2020). More frequently, researchers working in adjacent regions and subfields have drawn attention to problematic disciplinary histories and their continuing influence on archaeological and heritage discourses and practice (e.g., Armstrong‐Fumero, 2018; Breglia, 2006; Browman, 2011; Castañeda, 1996; Castillo Cocom, 2004; Euraque, 1998; Evans, 2004; Montejo, 2005; Palacios, 2012; Wainwright, 2008). Accounts of the past generated by archaeologists include discourses that assume incommensurability or static continuity between ancient and contemporary Indigenous peoples of the region (McAnany and Gallareta Negrón, 2010; Pezzarossi, 2020; Pyburn, 2006; Zimmermann et al., 2020, 664).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%