Lost in the stream? Professional efficacy perceptions of journalists in the context of dark participation

Abstract

Online comments and contributions from users are not always constructive nor rational. This also applies to content that is directed at journalists or published on journalistic platforms. So-called ‘dark participation’ in online communication is a challenge that journalists have to face because it lowers users’ perceived credibility of media brands and hinders a deliberative discourse in comment sections. This study examines how journalists perceive themselves in relation to dark participation, what measures they take against it, and how they assess the efficacy of these measures. Based on in-depth interviews ( N = 26), we find that journalists overall considered themselves to be effective in handling dark participation. The perceived efficacy differed according to the grade of engagement with users. Journalists who interacted very much or very little with users perceive the efficacy of their interventions to be highest, whilst those with medium levels of interaction rate their efficacy to be lower. Furthermore, the perceived amount of dark participation also affected the perceived efficacy.

Is journalism just a job? Findings on journalists’ career motivation, news efficacy and news avoidance from structural equation modeling in China

“…As for journalists, the level of interaction between journalists and audiences will affect their perceived efficacy (Wintterlin et al, 2021). A study of journalism students combines the motivation for public service ideal with self-efficacy, and finds that individuals’ confidence in journalistic skills to promote the awareness of a community issue will increase their political participation (Bobkowski and Rosenthal, 2022), indicating a potential positive connection between self-efficacy and advocacy motivation.…”