2021
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2021.0196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lost in Translation: A Disconnect Between the Science and Medicare Coverage Criteria for Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion

Abstract: Numerous studies have demonstrated the clinical value and safety of insulin pump therapy in type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes populations. However, the eligibility criteria for insulin pump coverage required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) discount conclusive evidence that supports insulin pump use in diabetes populations that are currently deemed ineligible. This article discusses the limitations and inconsistencies of the insulin pump eligibility criteria relative to current scientifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent pair of publications examined the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services coverage criteria for insulin pumps and CGMs. 122 , 123 These commentaries call for coverage criteria based on modern device use profiles and evidence-based requirements. They also note the demonstrated cost effectiveness of CGM and CSII technologies.…”
Section: Expert Opinion On Potential Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent pair of publications examined the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services coverage criteria for insulin pumps and CGMs. 122 , 123 These commentaries call for coverage criteria based on modern device use profiles and evidence-based requirements. They also note the demonstrated cost effectiveness of CGM and CSII technologies.…”
Section: Expert Opinion On Potential Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CMS’s coverage of glucose testing supplies is not aligned with eligibility requirements for diabetes devices. More importantly, eligibility requirements and coverage lag behind the evolving evidence of their effectiveness ( 15 , 16 ).…”
Section: Focus Area 2: Diabetes Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, not all these criteria are evidence-based and they may pose challenges for patients from disadvantaged backgrounds who may have more barriers to care and social determinants of health. While clinical guidelines have broadened their criteria for use [4][5][6], many insurance providers continue to have restrictive criteria resulting in a major barrier for many patients [35][36][37][38][39]. From the provider's perspective, a lack of infrastructure or support staff in clinics to address the multifaceted requirements of prescribing and managing patients with diabetes technology (such as handling insurance prior authorizations, providing diabetes education, and downloading reports etc.)…”
Section: System-level Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%