Lost in translation: A framework for analysing complexity of co-production settings in relation to epistemic communities, linguistic diversities and culture

Abstract

Planning in modern urban environments requires skills to address complexity in order to move towards sustainability. Co-production of knowledge in transdisciplinary groups represents a useful tool in such contexts. Using the concepts of epistemic communities, linguistic diversity and culture, the article proposes a conceptual framework for analysing complexity of co-production settings, as an indispensable means of managing complex challenges, thus making these complexities visible for the project leader (facilitator) and the participants of the co-production process. We evaluate the framework on the basis of inclusivity, cross-sectoral understanding, applicability in different contexts and time perspectives. Based on the framework, we identify several aspects that a process leader (facilitator) would need to address when preparing for a coproduction process: linguistic equality between participants, disciplinary integrity, a working culture of mutual respect, simultaneous mitigation and informed facilitation. Finally, the article suggests possible future research areas related to development of the framework, including (i) identification of levels of complexity and mapping specific tools to address complexity at each level; (ii) integration of other factors of complexity, such as political and institutional contexts, as well as diversity of gender and age in the facilitated group.

‘Rapid Scenario Planning’ to Support a Regional Sustainability Transformation Vision: A Case Study from Blekinge, Sweden

“…It is also important to distinguish scenarios from a likely future. Rather than a prediction, scenarios should allow for a new perspective(s) on a situation, coming to non-conventional conclusions and posing new questions [33]. Often, scenarios are used instead of or alongside visioning statements and support the development of the pathways towards desirable futures [32,[34][35][36].…”

Building Representative Corpora from Illiterate Communities: A Reviewof Challenges and Mitigation Strategies for Developing Countries

“…their worldview, Vasconcellos and Vasconcellos Sobrinho (2014)). It is important to consider local context when preparing to collect data in rural developing areas, as common data collection methods may be inappropriate due to contextual linguistic differences and deep-rooted social and cultural norms (Walker and Hamilton, 2011;Mafuta et al, 2016;Nikulina et al, 2019;. Selecting a contextually-appropriate data collection method is critical in mitigating social desirability bias in the collected data, among other challenges.…”

Clustering and assemblage building

“…Trans-language stems from pedagogy and implies not insisting on one language only in a pedagogical situation, but allowing and stimulating the use of more languages, often the national majority language (see, for example, Canagarajah, 2011), but here it also regards languages of varying professions and academic disciplines (see also Nikulina et al, 2019). While transformative language was introduced as a theme to reflect critically on how language takes a performative role in processes of migration and urban development, the concept of translanguage opens an uncertainty that can undermine pre-set definitions in a productive way.…”