Lost to follow-up among pregnant women in a multi-site community based maternal and newborn health registry: a prospective study

Abstract

BackgroundIt is important when conducting epidemiologic studies to closely monitor lost to follow up (LTFU) rates. A high LTFU rate may lead to incomplete study results which in turn can introduce bias to the trial or study, threatening the validity of the findings. There is scarce information on LTFU in prospective community-based perinatal epidemiological studies. This paper reports the rates of LTFU, describes socio-demographic characteristics, and pregnancy/delivery outcomes of mothers LTFU in a large community-based pregnancy registry study.MethodsData were from a prospective, population-based observational study of the Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research Maternal Newborn Health Registry (MNHR). This is a multi-centre, international study in which pregnant women were enrolled in mid-pregnancy, followed through parturition and 42 days post-delivery. Risk for LTFU was calculated within a 95%CI.ResultsA total of 282,626 subjects were enrolled in this study, of which 4,893 were lost to follow-up. Overall, there was a 1.7% LTFU to follow up rate. Factors associated with a higher LTFU included mothers who did not know their last menstrual period (RR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1, 4.4), maternal age of < 20 years (RR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1, 1.3), women with no formal education (RR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1, 1.4), and attending a government clinic for antenatal care (RR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4, 2.8). Post-natal factors associated with a higher LTFU rate included a newborn with feeding problems (RR 1.6, 94% CI 1.2, 2.2).ConclusionsThe LTFU rate in this community-based registry was low (1.7%). Maternal age, maternal level of education, pregnancy status at enrollment and using a government facility for ANC are factors associated with being LTFU. Strategies to ensure representation and high retention in community studies are important to informing progress toward public health goals.Trial registrationRegistration at the Clinicaltrials.gov (ID# NCT01073475).

Latency period and early initiation of breastfeeding in term premature rupture of membrane in Southern Ethiopia, 2017

“…On the other corner, the study by Yahya and Adebayo, and Liben and Yesuf stated that mother’s educational status was positively associated with EIBF. This could be explained by the fact that low level of education brings limitation of the utilization ANC services [20]. This also leads to low level of women confidence and capability to make decisions about different maternal service utilization [21, 22].…”

Evaluation of a call center to assess post-discharge maternal and early neonatal outcomes of facility-based childbirth in Uttar Pradesh, India

“…The call center closed an impressive 98.0% of eligible cases, with the vast majority closed by a single call. Given the relatively low incidence of adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes at the population level, follow-up modalities with limited loss-to-follow-up are essential to ensure accurate reporting and to limit underreporting of events [ 56 ].…”

Immunization in pregnancy clinical research in low- and middle-income countries – Study design, regulatory and safety considerations

“…In a clinical research or intervention study, the pregnant women are often asked to attend more antenatal visits than the minimum number of four antenatal care visits recommended by the World Health Organization. There is a risk of reduced adherence to follow up visit schedules over the course of the study [6] , [12] , [29] .…”

“…This is because the maternal family typically provides care for the pregnant women and the newborn. In clinical research, only those women are included who agree to deliver at the designated health center, but the delivery plans often change over the course of the pregnancy or they return to the maternal home once the infants is born [12] , [29] .…”