1933
DOI: 10.1121/1.1915637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loudness, Its Definition, Measurement and Calculation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

13
260
2
7

Year Published

1952
1952
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 962 publications
(282 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
13
260
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…According to a classical definition, the term loudness describes the "magnitude of an auditory sensation" (Fletcher and Munson 1933). It is the perceptual correlate of sound intensity but also depends on a number of other acoustical variables, such as frequency, spectral bandwidth, stimulus duration, temporal fluctuations, or monaural vs. binaural stimulus presentation (Fletcher and Munson 1933;Zhang and Zeng 1997;Grimm et al 2002;Verhey and Uhlemann 2008;Epstein and Florentine 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to a classical definition, the term loudness describes the "magnitude of an auditory sensation" (Fletcher and Munson 1933). It is the perceptual correlate of sound intensity but also depends on a number of other acoustical variables, such as frequency, spectral bandwidth, stimulus duration, temporal fluctuations, or monaural vs. binaural stimulus presentation (Fletcher and Munson 1933;Zhang and Zeng 1997;Grimm et al 2002;Verhey and Uhlemann 2008;Epstein and Florentine 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the perceptual correlate of sound intensity but also depends on a number of other acoustical variables, such as frequency, spectral bandwidth, stimulus duration, temporal fluctuations, or monaural vs. binaural stimulus presentation (Fletcher and Munson 1933;Zhang and Zeng 1997;Grimm et al 2002;Verhey and Uhlemann 2008;Epstein and Florentine 2009). Also non-auditory factors like context effects and personality traits like anxiety can affect loudness (Stephens 1970;Algom and Marks 1990;Gabriel et al 1997;Menzel et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second impetus for the present study came from my recent attempts (not published) to use the method of magnitude estimation to assess loudness summation in individual subjects. Those experiments compared single tones to two-tone complexes comprising equally loud, widely separated sound frequencies-a condition in which I expected the two-tone complexes to be, on average, twice as loud as the single tones (e.g., Fletcher & Munson, 1933;Howes, 1950;Marks, 1979). Instead, I found that repeated presentation of the stimuli yielded less than complete summation-as if, with multiple replications of the stimulus sets, there was a contextual "assimilation" of the judgments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…If the bandwidth of asound is varied while keeping the overall intensity fixed, loudness remains constant as long as the bandwidth is smaller than ac ritical bandwidth, for larger bandwidths, loudness increases (e.g. [4,5,6,7,8,9]). This effect called spectral loudness summation is believedt or esult from an analysis of the incoming sound by abank of overlapping critical-band filters followed by acompressive nonlinearity in each filter that transforms the intensity to specificloudness, and a final loudness summation across channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%