2012
DOI: 10.3141/2295-08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Louisiana's Experience with Open-Graded Friction Course Mixtures

Abstract: The Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) began developing open-graded friction course (OGFC) mixtures in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Then, in the late 1980s, a moratorium was imposed on their use because of some early failure issues. However, OGFC mixture performance and service life have improved significantly since a new generation of OGFC mixture was promoted in the United States in the late 1990s. Inspired by the success of other state agencies, the Louisiana DOTD modified the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the study concluded that the addition of RAS to the mixtures showed a better rutting performance. Figure 2.10 Rut depth vs. asphalt mixture types (Cooper et al 2014) In a research conducted by Kabir et al [2012], Louisiana OGFC mixtures were evaluated based on their laboratory and field performances. In order to capture the rutting potential and moisture susceptibility of OGFC mixtures, a Hamburg LWT test was conducted on the mixtures.…”
Section: Healing Of Cracks Through Induction Heatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the study concluded that the addition of RAS to the mixtures showed a better rutting performance. Figure 2.10 Rut depth vs. asphalt mixture types (Cooper et al 2014) In a research conducted by Kabir et al [2012], Louisiana OGFC mixtures were evaluated based on their laboratory and field performances. In order to capture the rutting potential and moisture susceptibility of OGFC mixtures, a Hamburg LWT test was conducted on the mixtures.…”
Section: Healing Of Cracks Through Induction Heatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, previous research [13,33] concluded that the conventional test method (AASHTO T 166; based on the specimen saturated surface-dry weight) was not applicable for computing the bulk specific gravity of the compacted PFC mixture, G mb , and subsequent calculation of the total AV content.…”
Section: Volumetric Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Main causes of raveling can be related to materials selection and response as well as mix design including: (i) moisture damage (i.e., stripping) in the PFC mixture or in the underneath HMA layer [11,13,60], (ii) asphalt oxidative aging [45], (iii) limited asphalt film thickness [11], (iv) asphalt draindown [60], and (v) aggregate degradation during compaction. Raveling can also be associated with inadequate construction practices that include: (i) lack or poor tack coat underneath the PFC mixture, (ii) improper mixture compaction [61], and (iii) aggregate and temperature segregation [60].…”
Section: Mixture Distresses and Aspects Relatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Porous asphalt is sometimes used interchangeably with OGFC with respect to mix design, however, a distinct difference between porous asphalt and OGFC is that OGFC only serves as a surface drainage layer, while porous asphalt serves as a drainage structure by absorbing and storing storm water and discharging it into the ground (3,4). OGFC has gained an increased popularity in the many states where heavy rainfall events occur frequently, such as Louisiana, Alabama, Florida, and Georgia (5,6) OGFC mix design includes selection of asphalt binder and aggregate, determination of optimum binder content, and performance evaluation. The aggregate skeleton affects the long-term durability and porosity performance of OGFC pavement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%