The in vitro activity of posaconazole plus amphotericin B against conidia and hyphae of 30 clinical zygomycetes was investigated. The combination of posaconazole with amphotericin B was found to be significantly more synergistic (40%) against hyphae (P < 0.05) than against conidia (10%). Antagonism was not observed.Infections with zygomycetes are increasingly recognized in immunocompromised patients (7,8,18). The species within zygomycetes that are identified most commonly are those of the genera Rhizopus, Rhizomucor, Mucor, and Absidia (7). Presently, the standard therapy for treating these life-threatening infections consists of the removal of the predisposing factors, widespread surgical debridement, and high doses of intravenous amphotericin B (AMB) (2, 7). Nevertheless, even for patients who receive therapy, the rate of mortality is often above 50% (1, 7).Posaconazole is a novel member of the triazole class of antifungals (12) which exhibits activity against zygomycetes in vitro and in vivo (1,2,5,8,19,20). At present few data on combination treatments against zygomycetes are available (3, 4, 6, 10). The combination of posaconazole with caspofungin (10), as well as terbinafine with either AMB or voriconazole, showed synergistic effects against zygomycetes in vitro (6).The aim of this study was to analyze the antifungal activity of posaconazole in combination with AMB against hyphae of zygomycete species, since they represent invasive disease. The results obtained with conidia served as the control.A total of 30 clinical isolates of zygomycetes (Absidia corym-, and Cunninghamella bertholletiae [n ϭ 5]) were tested. MICs of posaconazole (kindly provided by Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, NJ) and AMB (Sigma Aldrich, Vienna, Austria) for conidia were tested according to the Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AFST-EUCAST) (14). RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 2% glucose as the assay medium and an inoculum size ranging from 2 ϫ 10 5 to 5 ϫ 10 5 CFU/ml were used (14). MICs for hyphae were evaluated by the method of . In short, the conidial stock solutions were prepared as described above. Then, 100-l samples of these solutions were added onto 96-well plates (Costar, Vienna, Austria) and incubated at 30°C for 16 to 22 h and allowed to form hyphae. This allowed the outgrowth of more than 95% of conidia, with a hyphal length that varied from 50 to 70 m, as determined by examination with an inverted microscope. Wells were washed and refilled with 100 l of RPMI 1640 medium-2% glucose, and the antifungal agents were added. All tests were performed twice and in duplicate. All drug end points were read visually as total growth inhibition for conidia and hyphae after 24 h of incubation at 35°C. Drug combinations were assessed using a checkerboard method. Synergy tests were evaluated by using MIC end points of each drug. The fractional inhibitory concentrations (FIC) of each drug for an individual isolate were calculated (11). ...