2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Love for quality, comparative advantage, and trade

Abstract: We propose a Ricardian trade model with horizontal and vertical di¤erentiation, where willingness to pay for quality rises with individuals'incomes, and productivity di¤erentials across countries are stronger for high-quality varieties of goods. Our theory predicts that the scope for trade widens and international specialisation intensi…es as incomes grow and wealthier consumers raise the quality of their consumption baskets. This implies that comparative advantages strengthen gradually over the path of develo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the canonical Ricardian example, comparative advantages are determined by relative productivity. However, a country might have a comparative advantage with respect to its trade partners if it differentiates its products through quality, branding or post-sale customer service (Jaimovich & Merella, 2015). On the one hand, if for a given product k a country i has higher productivity with respect to some trade partners, k can be traded at a lower price and eventually exported.…”
Section: Measuring Comparative Advantages: the Contribution To The Trmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the canonical Ricardian example, comparative advantages are determined by relative productivity. However, a country might have a comparative advantage with respect to its trade partners if it differentiates its products through quality, branding or post-sale customer service (Jaimovich & Merella, 2015). On the one hand, if for a given product k a country i has higher productivity with respect to some trade partners, k can be traded at a lower price and eventually exported.…”
Section: Measuring Comparative Advantages: the Contribution To The Trmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If some generic individual i decided to deviate to " i;1;q = 1, then he would generate a product innovation blueprint and sell it to a …rm for a payment i;1;q = (1 + ) =(1+ ) 1. 17 Given that when i sets " i;1;p = 1 he is o¤ered i;1;p = , the deviation to " i;1;q = 1 is actually not pro…table for him. 18 Next, we can also observe that a deviation to " i;1;q = 1 from " 1 = 0 cannot be optimal for a generic individual i in t = 1 either.…”
Section: (Absence Of) Product Innovation E¤ort In T=1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 3) When, alongside (16) and (17), also both (18) and (19) hold true, an equilibrium with " t = 0 also exists. When all the individuals alive in t set " t = 0, the expression in (10) applies, and thus Y t = 1+ R t 1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models with an endogenous emergence of comparative advantages can be found, for instance, in Redding (1999), Fajgelbaum, Grossman and Helpman (2011) and Jaimovich and Merella (2015). …”
Section: Equilibrium In Autarkymentioning
confidence: 99%