2017
DOI: 10.1093/sw/swx012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Love Your Love Life”: Disadvantaged African American Adolescents Cocreate Psychoeducational Romantic and Sexual Health Resources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sexual/reproductive health was the most common category of health issues addressed by the articles included in this review. This category included investigations centered on general reproductive health and sexually transmitted infection prevention, 40 cervical cancer/HPV, 41 and teen pregnancy. 42…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sexual/reproductive health was the most common category of health issues addressed by the articles included in this review. This category included investigations centered on general reproductive health and sexually transmitted infection prevention, 40 cervical cancer/HPV, 41 and teen pregnancy. 42…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SSB program actively involved both peer leaders and stakeholders throughout program development, implementation, and evaluation. Similarly, Stokar et al (2017) used a PAR model where adolescents co-created, co-instructed, and co-evaluated the Love Your Love Life (LYLL) psychoeducational program delivered during an afterschool and summer program for disadvantaged African American adolescents. In a cultural adaptation of the Safe Dates curriculum (Ravi, Black, et al, 2019; Ravi et al, 2018; Ravi, Mitschke, et al, 2019), researchers worked with peer leaders from the Karen Refugee community.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies involving other stakeholders such as health service professionals, practitioners, teachers, and community representatives typically did so at the start of program development to determine acceptability and feasibility of the project (Banyard et al, 2007). Studies utilising CBPR and related participatory models, engaged users and stakeholders throughout multiple stages of program development, implementation, and evaluation (Beatriz et al, 2018; Crooks et al, 2018; Fredland, 2010; Jozkowski & Ekbia, 2015; Murray, 2019; Potter et al, 2020; Potter et al, 2019; Ravi, Black, et al, 2019; Ravi, Mitschke, et al, 2019; Reddock et al, 2020; Reid et al, 2014; Richmond et al, 2008; Stokar et al, 2017). One study reported a case study of community-based action against child sexual abuse in Israel (Itzhaky & York, 2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations