2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2018.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low absolute paleointensity during Late Miocene Noma excursion of the Earth’s magnetic field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weakest paleointensity flow accompanies an excursion‐like direction (flow A3‐20 at 1,365 m altitude) (Ahn et al., 2020). Similar paleointensity variations were observed by other studies (e.g., Ferk & Leonhardt, 2009; Okayama et al., 2019). We consider that the successive lavas of AALIP with short eruption intervals enabled the observation of PSVs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The weakest paleointensity flow accompanies an excursion‐like direction (flow A3‐20 at 1,365 m altitude) (Ahn et al., 2020). Similar paleointensity variations were observed by other studies (e.g., Ferk & Leonhardt, 2009; Okayama et al., 2019). We consider that the successive lavas of AALIP with short eruption intervals enabled the observation of PSVs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…N spec /N try : the ratio of the number of accepted specimens to the total number of specimens. studies (e.g., Ferk & Leonhardt, 2009;Okayama et al, 2019). We consider that the successive lavas of AALIP with short eruption intervals enabled the observation of PSVs.…”
Section: 1029/2020gc009341mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is common practice to prolong the second hold duration to allow a similar amount of alteration to occur in a specimen that has presumably undergone some thermal stabilisation. Some examples of first (second) heat hold durations are: 30 (60) minutes (Tsunakawa and Shaw, 1994), 10 (20) minutes (Yamamoto et al, 2003), 24 (48) minutes (Yamamoto and Hoshi, 2008), 20-35 (30-45) minutes (Mochizuki et al, 2011), 15 (30) minutes (Yamamoto and Yamaoka, 2018), and 30 (40) minutes (Okayama et al, 2019).…”
Section: The Shaw Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the course of these assessments, it has been pointed out that the ARM correction is effective not only for correcting thermal alterations but also for correcting remanence anisotropy and compensating for possible magnetostatic interactions among magnetic domains. With this as background, the TS method has been applied to old igneous rocks in Africa (Ahn et al., 2016; Yoshimura et al., 2020), China (Yamamoto, Tsunakawa, et al., 2007), French Polynesia (Mochizuki et al., 2011; Yamamoto, Ishizuka, et al., 2007; Yamamoto & Tsunakawa, 2005), Hawaii (Singer et al., 2019; Yamamoto & Yamaoka, 2018), Japan (Kato et al., 2018; Mochizuki et al., 2013; Okayama et al., 2019; Tsunakawa et al., 2009; Yamamoto et al., 2010), Korea (Ahn & Yamamoto, 2019), Louisville seamount (Yamazaki & Yamamoto, 2014), New Zealand (Mochizuki et al., 2006), and archeological materials in Japan (Kitahara et al., 2018, 2021). Although LTD treatments are not necessarily included, the TS method has also been applied to Precambrian rocks (Lloyd, Biggin, et al., 2021; Thallner, Biggin, & Halls, 2021, Thallner, Biggin, McCausland, & Fu, 2021), partly with consideration for different sets of selection criteria (Lloyd, Paterson, et al., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%