1992
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.17.8283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low activation barriers characterize intramolecular electron transfer in ascorbate oxidase.

Abstract: Anaerobic reduction kinetics of the zucchini squash ascorbate oxidase (AO; L-ascorbate:oxygen oxidoreductase, EC 1.10. x 109 M-1-s-1] was followed by its subsequent reoxidation in three distinct phases, all found to be unimolecular processes with the respective specific rates of 201 ± 8, 20 ± 4, and 2.3 ± 0.2 s"' at pH 5.5 and 298 K. While at this pH no direct bimolecular reduction was resolved in the 330-nm band, at pH 7.0 such a direct process was observed [(6.5 are similar to values reported for the limit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
37
1
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
37
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1, the amplitude of the increase in absorbance associated with the reoxidation of the T1 Cu(I) centre during the intramolecular ET from T1 Cu(I) to T2 Cu(II) does not correspond to the complete reoxidation of the T1 site. A similar observation was made in the earlier pulse radiolysis studies [7,12,13]. Since the midpoint potential of T1 Cu(II)/Cu(I) for AxNiR has been reported to be 240 mV at 298 K [12] one may calculate a midpoint potential of T2 Cu(II)/Cu(I) from the above ET equilibrium to be 230 mV.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1, the amplitude of the increase in absorbance associated with the reoxidation of the T1 Cu(I) centre during the intramolecular ET from T1 Cu(I) to T2 Cu(II) does not correspond to the complete reoxidation of the T1 site. A similar observation was made in the earlier pulse radiolysis studies [7,12,13]. Since the midpoint potential of T1 Cu(II)/Cu(I) for AxNiR has been reported to be 240 mV at 298 K [12] one may calculate a midpoint potential of T2 Cu(II)/Cu(I) from the above ET equilibrium to be 230 mV.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In both enzymes the distance between the two centres is 12.5 A î . The activation parameters for the faster phase of intramolecular ET in AO are: vH g = 9.1 þ 1.1 kJ mol 3I and vS g = 3170 þ 9 J K 3I mol 3I [7]. It is of considerable interest to compare these values with those determined in the present study for the forward ET process in NiR: vH g = 22.7 þ 3.4 kJ mol 3I and vS g = 3126 þ 11 J K 3I mol 3I .…”
Section: Comparison With Ascorbate Oxidasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These kinetic results are in sharp contrast to those obtained from the more extensively studied MCO, AO from zucchini squash (20,(30)(31)(32)(33)(34). Upon reduction of AO by laser flash photolysis, a rapid bimolecular reaction with the T1 Cu occurs with a rate constant of 5 ϫ 10 20), about 10-fold larger than that for CueO.…”
contrasting
confidence: 51%
“…This second kinetic process results in an Ϸ50% return of the absorbance at 610 nm caused by Cu 2ϩ regeneration at the T1 site, implying that the two copper centers have similar reduction potentials, an interpretation further supported for AO by using pulse radiolytic reduction and monitoring of absorption by the trinuclear cluster at 330 nm (31,32). The rate constant for this intramolecular electron transfer reaction in AO, which is the sum of the forward and reverse rate constants, has a value of Ϸ160 s Ϫ1 (20,33), 16-fold larger than that for CueO (Ϸ10 s…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Ascorbate oxidase is a homodimer consisting of two subunits both containing the four copper arrangement. Here, two intramolecular ET processes are observed between T1[Cu(I)] and T3[Cu(II)], one with a rate constant of 200 s Ϫ1 and a slower one with a rate constant of 2.3 s Ϫ1 (9). The difference between the two rates could be explained by differences in activation entropies, which were attributed to differences in electronic coupling between the electron donor and acceptor in the two ascorbate oxidase monomers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%