2016
DOI: 10.1249/mss.0000000000000799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Active Male Adolescents

Abstract: Low-active adolescent males performing a single HIIT set twice weekly, in addition to one resistance training session, gained meaningful improvements in fitness and body composition. Performing additional HIIT sets provided no additional improvements to those of the lowest dose in this study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the difference in the baseline obesity status of participants may influence the outcomes of the two training regimes, the participants in the present study who possessed larger AVFAs (69.0 versus 64.9 cm 2 ) did not take any advantage of their obesity in the resultant AVFA reduction. The lack of a dose-response effect of HIIT on visceral fat reduction is in agreement with recent findings that male sedentary adolescents performing extra HIIT sets did not achieve additional improvements in specific fat loss compared with that resulting from the lowest dose [22]. Apparently, HIIT-induced abdominal visceral fat reduction is not likely dependent upon the amount of energy expended in exercise sessions; this is further confirmed by our recent findings of a similar AVFA reduction of 9.7 cm 2 (data not shown) in a group of young obese females after completing a 12-week HIIT at an identical intensity, where the work (400 kJ), exercise duration (46.3 ± 6.3 to 48.2 ± 6.4 min), and total O 2 cost (81.2 ± 5.5 L) per session were greater than those of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the difference in the baseline obesity status of participants may influence the outcomes of the two training regimes, the participants in the present study who possessed larger AVFAs (69.0 versus 64.9 cm 2 ) did not take any advantage of their obesity in the resultant AVFA reduction. The lack of a dose-response effect of HIIT on visceral fat reduction is in agreement with recent findings that male sedentary adolescents performing extra HIIT sets did not achieve additional improvements in specific fat loss compared with that resulting from the lowest dose [22]. Apparently, HIIT-induced abdominal visceral fat reduction is not likely dependent upon the amount of energy expended in exercise sessions; this is further confirmed by our recent findings of a similar AVFA reduction of 9.7 cm 2 (data not shown) in a group of young obese females after completing a 12-week HIIT at an identical intensity, where the work (400 kJ), exercise duration (46.3 ± 6.3 to 48.2 ± 6.4 min), and total O 2 cost (81.2 ± 5.5 L) per session were greater than those of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, previous findings about the dominance of interval training did not specify whether comparison of the specific fat loss was conducted in obese individuals participating in continuous training with prolonged exercise sessions (≥45 min). A dose-response relationship of visceral fat adaptation to aerobic training was noted in obese individuals [21], whereas a similar dose-response effect from interval training was vague [22]. It is unknown whether continuous exercise training consisting of prolonged sessions would have a quantitative advantage in abdominal visceral fat reduction, compared with that resulting from a HIIT program, among obese young women.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts to embed low-volume HIT into the school setting have delivered some promising findings to date; however recruitment of small and/or specific population samples (e.g. low-active males [ 25 ]) and adoption of single-activity protocols [ 8 , 20 , 21 , 22 ] hinders generalisability and application in wider youth populations and contexts. Further, when compared to the wealth of adult data on the topic, evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of low-volume HIT on health and fitness outcomes in adolescents is still lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, regardless of outcome, protocols requiring specialist equipment like cycle ergometers could simply be deemed impractical in real-life settings like schools, due to costs. This issue was partly addressed in a recent trial in New Zealand, where 8-weeks of twice-weekly HIT, performed on pre-existing school physical education (PE) equipment such as rowing machines, treadmills and cross trainers, yielded improvements in VO 2peak , body fat percentage, lean tissue mass, visceral fat mass and waist circumference-to-height ratio in a small group of low-active male adolescents [ 25 ]. Here, however, HIT was supplemented with resistance training; thus determining the isolated effect of HIT was not possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 65 Thirteen were conducted in European schools 66 78 and two in Australasia. 79 , 80 Five, 66 , 68 , 69 , 75 , 77 nine,67,70,72–74,76,78–80 and one 71 took place in primary, secondary, and special education schools, respectively.…”
Section: High-intensity Interval Exercise Training In the School Settmentioning
confidence: 99%