QUESTION ASKED: How do older breast cancer survivors make decisions about persisting with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and manage treatment-related challenges?SUMMARY ANSWER: Essential to women's decision making to persist with AIs was the reality of acknowledging that taking the pill marked a new phase of treatment rather than the end of the cancer experience. When women experienced treatment-related challenges, such as adverse effects that affected quality of life, they relied on self-management strategies rather than the support of their medical providers.WHAT WE DID: Eligible women were recruited from a variety of settings. Single-session, indepth interviews using a semistructured interview guide were conducted with women age 65 years or older who were treated for locoregional breast cancer and had started an AI 4 to 36 months before study enrollment. Data analysis followed the systematic guidelines of constructivist grounded theory.WHAT WE FOUND: A total of 27 women were interviewed, and they reported that integrating the AI treatment into daily life posed many challenges. The adverse effects of AIs were difficult to disentangle from what women attributed to comorbid conditions or getting older. This challenge in attribution, coupled with less frequent contact with their oncology team, resulted in many women "winging it" or persisting with the AI despite significant struggles. In particular, participants expressed concerns about the impact of perceived adverse effects on quality of life and ability to carry out social roles. Many reported lack of professional guidance or support with respect to persisting with the AI, especially when adverse effects were present, and relied on a variety of self-management strategies to maintain treatment with the AI. The women often described circumstances, or potential tipping points, under which they might discontinue the AI prematurely.
BIAS, CONFOUNDING FACTOR(S), DRAWBACKS:Although they comprised a small sample limited to one geographic region of the country, the women were from diverse racial, cultural, and social backgrounds that added depth to their experiences of decision making.
REAL-LIFE IMPLICATIONS:Older breast cancer survivors who are persisting with AI treatment may be "winging it," attempting to self-manage adverse effects on their own, and may be at risk for early discontinuation. Participants needed AI-specific education, support, and practical selfmanagement strategies to improve both medication persistence and quality of life. We offer possible strategies to enhance clinical management and adherence.
Patients and MethodsWe used grounded theory methodology to conduct in-depth, semistructured interviews and analyze data among patients with breast cancer diagnosed at age 65 years or older who were receiving an AI. The goal of the interviews was to understand decision making regarding persisting with AIs. Interview transcripts were systematically analyzed to identify emergent categories and relationships.
ResultsInterviews were conducted with 27 women. After ...