2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-affinity CTCF binding drives transcriptional regulation whereas high-affinity binding encompasses architectural functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(147 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the absence of RNA, CTCF is only stably bound to high-affinity binding sites, while RNA binding leads to stable binding also at low-affinity sites ( Figure S4A , C ). Correspondingly, in vivo , low-affinity CBSs flank regions of active chromatin and have been associated with transcriptional regulation, while high-affinity CBSs more often flank repressed chromatin and are associated with regulating genome architecture 19 . CTCF on high-affinity CBSs is highly stable 17,18 , and loop domains can persist for hours without energy input, requiring stable anchoring by CTCF 67 , in agreement with our observed long lifetimes on CBSs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the absence of RNA, CTCF is only stably bound to high-affinity binding sites, while RNA binding leads to stable binding also at low-affinity sites ( Figure S4A , C ). Correspondingly, in vivo , low-affinity CBSs flank regions of active chromatin and have been associated with transcriptional regulation, while high-affinity CBSs more often flank repressed chromatin and are associated with regulating genome architecture 19 . CTCF on high-affinity CBSs is highly stable 17,18 , and loop domains can persist for hours without energy input, requiring stable anchoring by CTCF 67 , in agreement with our observed long lifetimes on CBSs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CTCF on high-affinity CBSs is highly stable 17,18 , and loop domains can persist for hours without energy input, requiring stable anchoring by CTCF 67 , in agreement with our observed long lifetimes on CBSs. Binding to low-affinity binding sites is less persistent 19 and disrupted by transcription inhibition or RNA-binding deficient mutants 29 . Our results therefore support a model where RNA transcripts are an important regulator of CTCF binding positions and stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CTCF binds tens of thousands of enhancers and promoters on mammalian chromosomes by the use of its 11 tandem zinc finger (ZF) DNA-binding domain and establishes interactions between distant enhancers and promoters by means of DNA loop extrusion ( 21 ). It is possible that high-affinity sites play structural roles in chromatin, while the lower-affinity sites are responsible for regulating transcription ( 22 ). A major question is how CTCF-bound enhancer and promoter elements find each other, stabilizing interactions between the two distant DNA elements and yielding associations with a long residence time [on the order of 22 min ( 23 )] that are detectable in heatmaps of Hi-C data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2 At a higher structural level, topologically associated domains (TADs) describe submegabase domains, while chromatin loops provide finer resolution contact information. 3 , 4 Incorrect chromosome structure misdirects the physical contacts between genomic loci, constituting pathogenic mechanisms that control various diseases, including cancer. 5 For instance, perturbations of insulated TAD boundaries are thought to be sufficient to activate oncogenes; 6 , 7 reprogramming of the multiscale 3D genome was found to control the transcriptome in prostate cancer 8 and pancreatic cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%