2023
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low- and High-energy Neutrinos from SN 2023ixf in M101

Dafne Guetta,
Aurora Langella,
Silvia Gagliardini
et al.

Abstract: Supernova (SN) 2023ixf in M101 is the closest SN explosion observed in the last decade. Therefore, it is a suitable test bed to study the role of jets in powering the SN ejecta. With this aim, we explored the idea that high-energy neutrinos could be produced during the interaction between the jets and the intense radiation field produced in the SN explosion and eventually be observed by the IceCube neutrino telescope. The lack of detection of such neutrinos has significantly constrained both the fraction of st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The X-ray detection, starting about 4 days after the explosion, also supported the scenario of the circumstellar interaction (Chandra et al 2023;Grefenstette et al 2023;Mereminskiy et al 2023). So far, no evidence has been found for statistically significant emission in the submillimeter (Berger et al 2023), radio (at 10 GHz Matthews et al 2023aMatthews et al , 2023bMatthews et al 2023cMatthews et al , 2023d, gamma rays (Ravensburg et al 2024), and neutrinos (Guetta et al 2023;Thwaites et al 2023). Further, the spectropolarimetric investigation of this event revealed an aspherical SN explosion and distinct geometry of the CSM (Vasylyev et al 2023) and provided a temporally resolved description of a massive star explosion (Zimmerman et al 2024).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The X-ray detection, starting about 4 days after the explosion, also supported the scenario of the circumstellar interaction (Chandra et al 2023;Grefenstette et al 2023;Mereminskiy et al 2023). So far, no evidence has been found for statistically significant emission in the submillimeter (Berger et al 2023), radio (at 10 GHz Matthews et al 2023aMatthews et al , 2023bMatthews et al 2023cMatthews et al , 2023d, gamma rays (Ravensburg et al 2024), and neutrinos (Guetta et al 2023;Thwaites et al 2023). Further, the spectropolarimetric investigation of this event revealed an aspherical SN explosion and distinct geometry of the CSM (Vasylyev et al 2023) and provided a temporally resolved description of a massive star explosion (Zimmerman et al 2024).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…This is in agreement with the absence of signal in the IceCube follow up of the event (Thwaites et al 2023). For more details on the predicted flux and event expectation, see Appendix C. We note that Guetta et al (2023) has investigated both lowand high-energy neutrino emission from SN 2023ixf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BH might launch relativistic jets. Such jets might lead to new processes in the supernova that do not occur when an NS is formed, e.g., neutrino emission as in choked gamma-ray bursts (as calculated by, e.g., Sahu & Zhang 2010;He et al 2018;Fasano et al 2021;Guetta et al 2023).…”
Section: The Possible Role Of Core Rotationmentioning
confidence: 99%