2006
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low and intermediate mass star yields

Abstract: Aims. We analyze the impact on the Galactic nitrogen abundances with a new set of low and intermediate mass star yields. These yields contain a significant yield of primary nitrogen from intermediate mass stars. Methods. We use these yields as an input for a galactic chemical evolution model and study the nitrogen abundances in the halo and in the disc, and compare them with models obtained using other yield sets and with a large amount of observational data. Results. We find that with these new yields our mod… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(86 reference statements)
4
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Romano et al (2006), using N yields for LIMSs by van der Hoek & Groenewegen (1997), which are different from those adopted by us, cannot reproduce the N/O values of NGC 1705, a late-type dwarf galaxy. On the other hand, Gavilán et al (2006), using their own N yields, are able to match the present-day N/O value of the solar vicinity, but not the N/O evolution. This problem should be studied further.…”
Section: The N/o Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Romano et al (2006), using N yields for LIMSs by van der Hoek & Groenewegen (1997), which are different from those adopted by us, cannot reproduce the N/O values of NGC 1705, a late-type dwarf galaxy. On the other hand, Gavilán et al (2006), using their own N yields, are able to match the present-day N/O value of the solar vicinity, but not the N/O evolution. This problem should be studied further.…”
Section: The N/o Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sources: (Amarsi et al 2015, O, blue and black points) (Ruchti et al 2011, Mg, Si, dark green), (Adibekyan et al 2012, Mg, Si, grey), (González Hernández et al 2013, Mg, Si, orange), (Bensby et al 2014, Mg, Si, blue discs), (Hinkel et al 2014, Mg, Si, purple), (Howes et al 2015, Mg, Si, red circles) , Si, blue circles) Dopita et al (2000); Groves et al (2004); Dopita et al (2013), and Izotov & Thuan (1999)), so we accept this model as a useful description of the scaling behaviour of nitrogen. The observed dispersion in the values of log(N/O), especially at low metallicity, are discussed in Gavilán et al (2006). Clearly, this spread makes specifying a single description problematic, but we use the fit described here, noting that it should be treated as a starting point for modelling, rather than being prescriptive.…”
Section: Carbon and Nitrogenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solar abundance models are adequate, since there is no evidence that the mean values of [Fe/H] and the metallicity (essentially, the sum of C, N, and O abundances) have changed appreciably in the past $10 Gyr, although there is a considerable and nearly constant scatter over time ( Nordström et al 2004;KarataY et al 2005;Haywood 2006;Gavilán et al 2006). Second-generation models, 2 which take into account line blanketing from iron peak elements, were used in all cases but one.…”
Section: Incident Continuummentioning
confidence: 99%