2021
DOI: 10.1111/codi.15548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low anterior resection syndrome – ‘braking’ our focus with the pelvis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This scoring system ranged from 18–90, higher scores indicate better levels of bowel function. However, this scoring system was not universally applicable and could not be widely used ( 1 , 14 , 36 ). The second idea of LARS scoring system which had five-item validated questionnaire evaluating the bowel functions after CRC surgery in 2012, and this questionnaire has been used to evaluate LARS worldwide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scoring system ranged from 18–90, higher scores indicate better levels of bowel function. However, this scoring system was not universally applicable and could not be widely used ( 1 , 14 , 36 ). The second idea of LARS scoring system which had five-item validated questionnaire evaluating the bowel functions after CRC surgery in 2012, and this questionnaire has been used to evaluate LARS worldwide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every item has three options with a de ned scoring system used for evaluating the severity. The patients were divided into the no (0-20), minor (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29), and major (30-42) LARS groups depending on their total score (Table 2). We used the Chinese version of the questionnaire.…”
Section: Lars Questionnaire and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scoring system ranged from 18 to 90, higher scores indicate better levels of bowel function. However, this scoring system was not universally applicable and could not be widely used [1,16,24]. The second LARS scoring system is a veitem validated questionnaire created in 2012 for the Danish population that evaluates the bowel function after CRC surgery (Table 1) [5,25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%