Low back pain does not improve with surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

Lau, Trevin C.; Weinstein, Milena M.; Wakamatsu, May; Macklin, Eric A.; Pulliam, Samantha J.

doi:10.1007/s00192-012-1797-9

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We also found that women with symptoms of POP were more likely to report PGP and/or LBP. This finding is contrary to what two previous studies have reported (238,239). The difference in findings might be due to differences in populations and measurements.…”

Section: Prevalence and Severity Of Pelvic Girdle Pain And/or Low Baccontrasting

confidence: 99%

Pelvic floor muscle training programme in pregnant Nepalese women—a feasibility study

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Prevalence and Severity Of Pelvic Girdle Pain And/or Low Baccontrasting

confidence: 99%

Pelvic floor muscle training programme in pregnant Nepalese women—a feasibility study

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The numbers observed in our study thus correspond to those found in the literature, with a 38-51% occurrence of chronic pain, depending on whether a suture or tacker fixation was used. The association between genital prolapse and chronic pelvic and lumbar pain remains highly controversial [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. One may wonder why LS using tackers should carry a greater risk of causing lumbosciatica than LS using a suture.…”

Section: Commentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Satisfaction, quality of life and lumbar pain following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: suture vs. tackers

Vieillefosse

Thubert

Daché

et al. 2015

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductiv

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…According to an FDA report, we are just beginning to see a small part of the iceberg of far more serious mesh complications . Should POP be dominated by the use of mesh?…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Laparoscopic extraperitoneal uterine suspension with suture line instead of mesh

Liang

Chen

Deng

et al. 2017

BJOG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To compare the safety and effectiveness of two different materials (mesh and suture line) used in laparoscopic extraperitoneal uterine suspension.Design A retrospective observational study.Setting Gynaecology departments in two hospitals in China.Population Women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) of stage II or higher.Methods The women were divided into two groups according to the two different materials for laparoscopic extraperitoneal uterine suspension: mesh or suture line. The baseline characteristics, perioperative details, complications, objective and subjective indexes of the two groups were compared.Main outcome measures The primary outcome was subjective satisfaction rate based upon validated questionnaires. The secondary outcome was objective anatomic assessment with the POP-Q system.Results No difference was found in baseline characteristics and perioperative details except that there were more cases of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and associated other surgeries in the Line than the Mesh group (36 versus 19, P < 0.05; 12 versus 2, P < 0.05). Statistically significant improvements were found in anatomical measures of points Aa, Ba, Ap, Bp, C and TVL (P < 0.01), as well as functional and quality-of-life measures (P < 0.01 for PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7) between both groups. The postoperative PFDI-20, PFIQ-7 and PGI-I scores were not different between two groups (P > 0.05). Two cases of deep wound infection were observed in Mesh group at 3-month follow up.Conclusions Laparoscopic extraperitoneal linear uterine suspension is easy to perform and is associated with fewer meshrelated complications. It is more secure, especially in elderly women and in those with physical complications.Keywords Laparoscopic, mesh, uterine prolapse, uterine suspension.Tweetable abstract Laparoscopic extraperitoneal linear uterine suspension is safe, with fewer mesh-related complications.

show abstract

Low back pain does not improve with surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

Abstract: Our study found a statistically significant but not clinically significant improvement of LBP after surgical repair of prolapse.

Cited by 4 publications

References 5 publications

Pelvic floor muscle training programme in pregnant Nepalese women—a feasibility study

Pelvic floor muscle training programme in pregnant Nepalese women—a feasibility study

Satisfaction, quality of life and lumbar pain following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: suture vs. tackers

Laparoscopic extraperitoneal uterine suspension with suture line instead of mesh

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About