2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.105387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-boom low-drag optimization in a multidisciplinary design analysis optimization environment

Abstract: This paper introduces a multidisciplinary design analysis and optimization environment called GENUS. The GENUS aircraft design environment's key features are that it is modular, expandable, flexible, independent, and sustainable. This paper discusses the application of this environment to the design of supersonic business jets (SSBJs). SSBJs are regarded as the pioneers of the next generation of supersonic airliners. Methodologies appropriate to SSBJs are developed in the GENUS environment. The Mach plane cros… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GENUS has proven its capability in aircraft conceptual designs through a series novel aircraft studies [4][5][6][7][8]. The E-19 AEOLUS design is based on the low-boom low-drag supersonic business jet design research within the aircraft design group [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: A Brief Review Of the Group Design Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GENUS has proven its capability in aircraft conceptual designs through a series novel aircraft studies [4][5][6][7][8]. The E-19 AEOLUS design is based on the low-boom low-drag supersonic business jet design research within the aircraft design group [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: A Brief Review Of the Group Design Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sonic boom can be avoided below the cut-off Mach number (around Mach 1.15), however, the time advantage at this Mach number is not evident. Through the previous studies, the authors have established a multidisciplinary methodologies for supersonic transport 24 , validated the design model against different designs 25 , demonstrated the sonic boom can be shaped by tailoring the lift and volume distribution 26 , and proved the feasibility of low-boom and low-drag design optimization 27 . Therefore, all the previous efforts make the design of a low-boom low-drag SSBJ concept possible.…”
Section: Ssbj Design Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ban [27] adopted a supersonic biplane concept and a supersonic twin-body concept to reduce the sonic boom and wave drag of supersonic transport. Establishing the multidisciplinary methodologies for supersonic transport, Sun et al [28,29] evaluated the sonic boom characteristics and aerodynamics of six business-class configurations. And they finally found out the low-boom and low-drag design solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%