2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2009.5199148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Bound of Energy-Latency Trade-Off of Opportunistic Routing in Multi-Hop Networks

Abstract: During the last decade, many works were devoted to improving the performance of relaying techniques in ad hoc networks. One promising approach consists in allowing the relay nodes to cooperate, thus using spatial diversity to increase the capacity of the system. However, this approach introduces an overhead in terms of information exchange, increasing the complexity of the receivers. A simpler way of exploiting spatial diversity is referred to as opportunistic routing. In this scheme, a cluster of nodes still … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-Concerning the energy-outage probability tradeoff, we should enlarge our study to compare the different policies with different transmission powers. For this purpose, our previous works in a multiobjective framework [23] would offer a more powerful comparison of the different strategies. -From a practical point of view, we plan to evaluate these scheme on experimental BANs to validate outage, latency, and energy models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Concerning the energy-outage probability tradeoff, we should enlarge our study to compare the different policies with different transmission powers. For this purpose, our previous works in a multiobjective framework [23] would offer a more powerful comparison of the different strategies. -From a practical point of view, we plan to evaluate these scheme on experimental BANs to validate outage, latency, and energy models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If no suitable forwarding opportunity exists, the mobile nodes can store the message until such opportunity arises. The study reported in [7] showed that this store, carry and forward approach can reduce the energy consumption despite an increase in the transmission delay. The benefits of integrating MCN and opportunistic networking are discussed in [4], where the authors present novel routing policies that use information about the relays' mobility to reduce energy consumption [8], increase spatial capacity, reduce co-channel interference, balance the load across cells, and switch-off lowutilization base stations [9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the absence of forwarding opportunities, mobile nodes store the message and wait for future occasions in which to forward the message to other nodes. This approach can increase the transmission delay, but it can also significantly reduce the energy consumption [10]. Simple schemes, where an SN stores and carries the information until favorable communication conditions with the destination node are found, have been shown to reduce energy consumption [11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%