2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-carbon scenarios for Russia's energy system: A participative backcasting approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, backcasting is usually combined with foresighting (Gaziulusoy et al. ; Sharmina ), a scenario method characterized as “exploratory” because it answers the “what‐if” questions (Börjeson et al. ).…”
Section: Backcasting and Eco‐design Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, backcasting is usually combined with foresighting (Gaziulusoy et al. ; Sharmina ), a scenario method characterized as “exploratory” because it answers the “what‐if” questions (Börjeson et al. ).…”
Section: Backcasting and Eco‐design Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Mitrova (2014) , Pristupa and Mol (2015) , Proskuryakova and Filippov (2015) , evaluated the country's energy system sustainability, with a focus on renewable energy, natural gas, and nuclear power. Both Tursoy and Resatoglu (2016) and Sharmina (2017) made carbon emissions reduction and energy efficiency improvement scenarios for Russia. Bruusgaard (2006) , Bogoviz et al (2017) , Ragulina et al (2018) , Bogoviz et al (2019) used some ES indicators to demonstrate historical trends on ES performance in Russia.…”
Section: Energy Security Conceptualisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, more efforts are yet needed to develop, implement and apply comprehensive nexus frameworks, incorporate overlooked drivers and regions, expand and diversify nexus toolboxes, mainstream nexus approaches into policy making, governance and management and coordinate knowledge integration and stakeholder engagement across sectors (Liu et al 2018). By comparison, backcasting provides a more comprehensive approach for achieving system resilience and sustainability in climate change mitigation (Sharmina 2017). Backcasting is considered suitable due to its applicability at various temporal and spatial scales, compatibility with various tools and methods, and its ability to support various forms of stakeholder engagement (Quist et al 2011;Van der Voorn et al 2017).…”
Section: Backcastingmentioning
confidence: 99%