2011
DOI: 10.1109/jstsp.2011.2166950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Complexity Detection in Large-Dimension MIMO-ISI Channels Using Graphical Models

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper, we deal with low-complexity near-optimal detection/equalization in large-dimension multiple-input multiple-output inter-symbol interference (MIMO-ISI) channels using message passing on graphical models. A key contribution in the paper is the demonstration that near-optimal performance in MIMO-ISI channels with large dimensions can be achieved at low complexities through simple yet effective simplifications/approximations, although the graphical models that represent MIMO-ISI channels ar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
140
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
140
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9. Comparison of the BER performance of the proposed CHEMP receiver with those of 1) MMSE detector with MMSE channel estimate, and 2) FG-GAI detector in [11] with MMSE channel estimate, for , 4-QAM.…”
Section: Note On Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…9. Comparison of the BER performance of the proposed CHEMP receiver with those of 1) MMSE detector with MMSE channel estimate, and 2) FG-GAI detector in [11] with MMSE channel estimate, for , 4-QAM.…”
Section: Note On Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare the performance of the CHEMP receiver with two other receivers, namely, 1) MMSE detector with MMSE channel estimate, and 2) FG-GAI (factor graph with Gaussian approximation of interference) detector in [11] with MMSE channel estimate. We note that the FG-GAI detector in [11] is also a message passing algorithm which used a Gaussian approximation of interference. But this approximation was done on the original system model in (2), whereas in the proposed MPD algorithm, the Gaussian approximation is done on the matched filtered system model in (7).…”
Section: F Ber Performance Of the Chemp Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is natural to seek to improve over linear receivers by considering a committee of linear receivers, and given its success story, AdaBoost is a natural candidate to learn the parameters of such a committee. We note that in recent years, ideas from machine learning have been used in communications [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. In particular, [22] proposes joint channel estimation and multiuser detection based on a "total least squares" approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%