Abstract. Kidney volume is an important parameter in clinical practice, and accurate assessment of kidney volume is vital. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of various environments, tube voltages, tube currents and slice thicknesses on the accuracy of a novel segmentation software in determining renal volume on computed tomography (CT) images. The volumes of potatoes and porcine kidneys were measured on CT images and compared with the actual volumes, which were determined by a water displacement method. CT scans were performed under various situations, including different environments (air or oil); tube voltages/tube currents (80 kVp/200 mAs, 120 kVp/200 mAs, 120 kVp/100 mAs); and reconstructed slice thicknesses (0.75 or 1.5 mm). Percentage errors (PEs) relative to the reference standards were calculated. In addition, attenuation and image noise under different CT scanning parameters were compared. Student's t-test was also used to analyze the effect of various conditions on image quality and volume measurements. The results indicated that the volumes measured in oil were closer to the actual volumes (P<0.05). Furthermore, attenuation and image noise significantly increased when using a tube voltage of 80 kVp, while the mean PEs between 120 and 80 kVp voltages were not significantly different. The mean PEs were greater when using a tube current of 100 mAs compared with a current of 200 mAs (P<0.05). In addition, the volumes measured on 1.5 mm slice thickness were closer to the actual volumes (P<0.05). In conclusion, different environments, tube currents and slice thicknesses may affect the volume measurements. In the present study, the most accurate volume measurements were obtained at 120 kVp/200 mAs and a slice thickness of 1.5 mm.
IntroductionKidney volume is an important parameter that must be considered for the selection of appropriate management, surgery planning and evaluation of disease status in patients with kidney disease (1-5). Therefore, precise kidney volumetry has been receiving increasing attention clinically. Typically, kidney size or volume measurement is evaluated using various cross-sectional imaging modalities, including ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (6-12). US is an easily used and low-cost technique. Using this method, the renal volume is usually calculated by measuring the three axes of the kidney (length, width and thickness) and then applying these values to an ellipsoid formula (6). However, the shape of the kidney varies greatly in the majority of cases, and as a result, errors in volume calculations by US may occur (6,7). MRI provides outstanding sensitivity for the discrimination of soft tissues that facilitates the segmentation of the kidney (8). However, various factors, such as spatial resolution, artifacts and signal non-uniformities, can affect the accuracy in image segmentation by MRI (9,10). With the advancements in multidetector CT (MDCT), improvements of spatial resolution and time resolution, the a...